Goldfischer E R, Cromie W J, Karrison T G, Naszkiewicz L, Gerber G S
University of Chicago Hospitals, Illinois, USA.
J Urol. 1997 Jan;157(1):90-4.
There is no clear evidence that intraurethral lidocaine jelly decreases pain and/or makes rigid cystoscopy more tolerable for patients. Since lidocaine jelly is significantly more expensive than plain lubricant, we attempted to assess the true benefit of this agent.
We performed a randomized, prospective, double-blind study to compare the anesthetic effects of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly versus plain lubricant in patients undergoing rigid cystoscopy. Unlike previous studies, we ensured adequate urethral filling by using 30 cc of each agent and we waited 20 minutes after instillation of the agent before performing cystoscopy to allow adequate absorption. Cystoscopy was performed using a 17 to 21F rigid instrument. A total of 189 patients was entered into the study but 10 were excluded from analysis due to incomplete questionnaires. A 10-point scale (1-least to 10-most painful) was used to measure pain perception.
In men pain perception was significantly decreased when lidocaine jelly was used (mean plus or minus standard error 3.00 +/- 0.21 versus 4.36 +/- 0.37 points, p = 0.002). In women there was no observed difference in pain perception when lidocaine jelly or plain lubricant was used (3.21 +/- 0.38 versus 3.11 +/- 0.30 points, p = 0.823). Patient race, performance of a related procedure, cystoscope size or history of cystoscopy did not significantly affect reported pain scores. There was a slight decrease in pain perception with increasing age (-0.23 +/- 0.10 points per decade, p = 0.021). The level of patient anxiety before cystoscopy was also significantly associated with pain perception (p < 0.001).
Lidocaine jelly offers no advantage over plain lubricant in regard to pain control during rigid cystoscopy in women. However, when used in adequate amounts and allowed to dwell in the urethra for 20 minutes before cystoscopy, lidocaine jelly can significantly decrease pain in men.
尚无明确证据表明尿道内利多卡因凝胶能减轻疼痛和/或使患者更能耐受硬性膀胱镜检查。由于利多卡因凝胶比普通润滑剂贵得多,我们试图评估这种药物的真正益处。
我们进行了一项随机、前瞻性、双盲研究,比较尿道内2%利多卡因凝胶与普通润滑剂在接受硬性膀胱镜检查患者中的麻醉效果。与以往研究不同,我们使用每种药物30毫升以确保尿道充分充盈,并在注入药物后等待20分钟再进行膀胱镜检查,以使药物充分吸收。使用17至21F的硬性器械进行膀胱镜检查。共有189例患者进入研究,但因问卷不完整,10例被排除在分析之外。采用10分制(1分表示最不痛,10分表示最痛)来测量疼痛感知。
使用利多卡因凝胶时,男性的疼痛感知显著降低(平均±标准误3.00±0.21分对4.36±0.37分,p = 0.002)。使用利多卡因凝胶或普通润滑剂时,女性的疼痛感知未观察到差异(3.21±0.38分对3.11±0.30分,p = 0.823)。患者种族、相关手术的实施情况、膀胱镜大小或膀胱镜检查史对报告的疼痛评分无显著影响。随着年龄增长,疼痛感知略有下降(每十年-0.23±0.10分,p = 0.021)。膀胱镜检查前患者的焦虑程度也与疼痛感知显著相关(p < 0.001)。
在女性硬性膀胱镜检查的疼痛控制方面,利多卡因凝胶与普通润滑剂相比并无优势。然而,在足够用量并在膀胱镜检查前让其在尿道中停留20分钟的情况下,利多卡因凝胶可显著减轻男性的疼痛。