Bhagavan S, Smith B H
Department of Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1220, USA.
Physiol Behav. 1997 Jan;61(1):107-17. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00357-5.
Any odor-guided behavior might require generalization and/or discrimination over a wide range of odorant intensities. Proboscis extension conditioning (PEC) and electroantennogram (EAG) assays were used to investigate stimulus-intensity dynamics during olfactory processing in the honey bee. Experiments that tested generalization involved conditioning to one odorant concentration and either testing with a different odorant or with different concentrations of the same odorant. At low training concentrations, responses to either a novel odorant or to higher concentrations of the same odorant resulted in strong generalization. At higher training concentrations, significantly less generalization was observed to a novel odorant or to lower concentrations of the same odor. EAG analyses indicate that asymmetric generalization could arise due to long-term adaptation of peripheral receptor neurons. Discrimination experiments showed that relatively higher odorant concentrations associated with an appetitive reinforcer could usually be discriminated from a lower concentration that was associated with punishment, but not vice versa. Although sensory modulation in peripheral (sensory) processes might be sufficient to account for discrimination of a high from a low concentration, discrimination of low from high concentrations point to the involvement of central processes.
任何由气味引导的行为可能都需要在广泛的气味强度范围内进行泛化和/或辨别。采用喙伸条件反射(PEC)和触角电图(EAG)测定法来研究蜜蜂嗅觉处理过程中的刺激强度动态变化。测试泛化的实验包括对一种气味浓度进行条件反射训练,然后用不同的气味或相同气味的不同浓度进行测试。在低训练浓度下,对新气味或相同气味的较高浓度的反应会产生强烈的泛化。在较高训练浓度下,对新气味或相同气味的较低浓度的泛化明显较少。EAG分析表明,不对称泛化可能是由于外周受体神经元的长期适应引起的。辨别实验表明,与食欲强化物相关的相对较高的气味浓度通常可以与与惩罚相关的较低浓度区分开来,但反之则不然。虽然外周(感觉)过程中的感觉调节可能足以解释高浓度与低浓度的辨别,但低浓度与高浓度的辨别表明中枢过程也参与其中。