Singer M
Hispanic Health Council, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
Med Anthropol Q. 1996 Dec;10(4):496-515. doi: 10.1525/maq.1996.10.4.02a00050.
This article argues that human adaptation has lost its utility as a conceptual tool for either biological or medical anthropology, despite the recent efforts of practitioners in these subdisciplines to rescue it by considering the influences of power, history, and global social processes. It draws on cases from diverse fields, including evolutionary studies, ethology, genetics, and epidemiology, to suggest new ways of conceptualizing the relationship between humans and their physical and biotic environments; environments that they, and to a lesser degree other species, are not so much "adapting to" as transforming, while being transformed themselves in the process. Central to this reconceptualization is an understanding of human behavior and environmental relationships in political-economic context.
本文认为,尽管生物人类学和医学人类学领域的从业者最近努力通过考虑权力、历史和全球社会进程的影响来挽救人类适应这一概念工具,但它作为一种概念工具在这两个学科中已失去了效用。本文借鉴了进化研究、动物行为学、遗传学和流行病学等不同领域的案例,以提出将人类与其物理和生物环境之间的关系概念化的新方法;在这些环境中,人类以及在较小程度上其他物种与其说是在“适应”,不如说是在改变环境,同时自身也在这个过程中被改变。这种重新概念化的核心是在政治经济背景下理解人类行为与环境的关系。