Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA.
Hum Nat. 2012 Sep;23(3):306-22. doi: 10.1007/s12110-012-9150-z.
The application of evolutionary theory to human behavior has elicited a variety of critiques, some of which charge that this approach expresses or encourages conservative or reactionary political agendas. In a survey of graduate students in psychology, Tybur, Miller, and Gangestad (Human Nature, 18, 313-328, 2007) found that the political attitudes of those who use an evolutionary approach did not differ from those of other psychology grad students. Here, we present results from a directed online survey of a broad sample of graduate students in anthropology that assays political views. We found that evolutionary anthropology graduate students were very liberal in their political beliefs, overwhelmingly voted for a liberal U.S. presidential candidate in the 2008 election, and identified with liberal political parties; in this, they were almost indistinguishable from non-evolutionary anthropology students. Our results contradict the view that evolutionary anthropologists hold conservative or reactionary political views. We discuss some possible reasons for the persistence of this view in terms of the sociology of science.
进化理论在人类行为中的应用引起了各种批评,其中一些指责这种方法表达或鼓励保守或反动的政治议程。在对心理学研究生的一项调查中,Tybur、Miller 和 Gangestad(《人性》,18,313-328,2007)发现,采用进化方法的人的政治态度与其他心理学研究生没有不同。在这里,我们呈现了一项针对广泛的人类学研究生样本的定向在线调查的结果,该调查衡量了政治观点。我们发现,进化人类学研究生的政治信仰非常自由,他们在 2008 年的选举中压倒性地投票给了一位自由派美国总统候选人,并认同自由派政党;在这方面,他们几乎与非进化人类学学生没有区别。我们的结果与进化人类学家持有保守或反动政治观点的观点相矛盾。我们根据科学社会学的观点讨论了这种观点持续存在的一些可能原因。