Knudsen F U
Glostrup University Hospital, Pediatric Department, Denmark.
Brain Dev. 1996 Nov-Dec;18(6):438-49. doi: 10.1016/s0387-7604(96)00059-9.
Assessment of treatment strategies in febrile seizures should be based on short- and long-term outcomes, with and without acute, intermittent, or chronic medical intervention, as well as short- and long-term side effects. Febrile seizures are a benign condition with a normal neurological, motor, intellectual, and cognitive long-term outcome and have a low risk of later epilepsy in most cases. Even many complex febrile seizures have a benign outcome. Prophylaxis may or may not reduce the recurrence rate, but does not appear to improve the long-term outcome as compared to acute treatment of seizures in progress. All agree that chronic prophylaxis with anti-epileptic agents is justified only in highly selected cases, if at all. Treatment with benzodiazepines during febrile episodes appears to effectively reduce the recurrence rate, provided adequate doses are given and compliance problems minimized. A selective approach to intermittent diazepam prophylaxis seems rational, as the recurrence risk and response to treatment are highly variable. An attractive alternative is acute treatment at seizure onset with rectal diazepam in solution given by the parents at home in order to prevent prolonged recurrent seizures. This regimen has the potential of moving the first line of anti-convulsant defence close to the child. It appears to be effective, inexpensive, feasible even for non-professionals, has few side effects and is well accepted by the parents. A reasonable policy would be to treat simple febrile seizures solely with acute rectal diazepam in solution and reserve intermittent diazepam prophylaxis for selected cases including those with multiple or prolonged recurrences, several risk factors for recurrent febrile seizures and other special situations.
对热性惊厥治疗策略的评估应基于短期和长期结果,无论有无急性、间歇性或慢性医学干预,以及短期和长期副作用。热性惊厥是一种良性病症,大多数情况下其神经、运动、智力和认知的长期预后正常,且日后患癫痫的风险较低。即使是许多复杂的热性惊厥也有良性预后。预防性治疗可能会降低复发率,也可能不会,但与对正在发作的惊厥进行急性治疗相比,似乎并不能改善长期预后。所有人都认为,仅在经过严格挑选的病例中,才可能有理由使用抗癫痫药物进行长期预防性治疗。在发热发作期间使用苯二氮䓬类药物治疗,似乎能有效降低复发率,前提是给予足够剂量并尽量减少依从性问题。对于间歇性地使用地西泮进行预防性治疗采取选择性方法似乎是合理的,因为复发风险和对治疗的反应差异很大。一个有吸引力的替代方法是在惊厥发作时进行急性治疗,由家长在家中给予直肠用溶液剂型的地西泮,以防止惊厥长时间反复发作。这种治疗方案有可能将抗惊厥防御的第一线靠近患儿。它似乎有效、廉价、即使非专业人员也可行,副作用少且为家长所广泛接受。一个合理的策略是仅用直肠用溶液剂型的地西泮对单纯性热性惊厥进行急性治疗,而将间歇性地西泮预防性治疗留用于特定病例,包括那些有多次或长时间复发、有多个热性惊厥复发风险因素以及其他特殊情况的病例。