Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜检查、超声检查和计算机断层扫描在胃癌分期中的前瞻性比较。

Prospective comparison of laparoscopy, ultrasonography and computed tomography in the staging of gastric cancer.

作者信息

Stell D A, Carter C R, Stewart I, Anderson J R

机构信息

University Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1996 Sep;83(9):1260-2.

PMID:8983624
Abstract

A total of 103 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma was assessed for intra-abdominal spread of malignancy using ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) and laparoscopy under general anaesthesia. Histologically proven metastases were to the liver in 27 patients, lymph nodes in 49 and directly to peritoneum in 13. All modalities showed a high specificity (92-100 per cent) for each type of metastasis. Laparoscopy was more sensitive in detecting hepatic, nodal and peritoneal metastases; the relative performance of laparoscopy was best with regard to hepatic metastases. Ultrasonography and CT were particularly poor at detecting nodal and peritoneal metastases. There was no significant morbidity and no mortality associated with laparoscopy, which was more accurate in preoperative staging of gastric cancer than ultrasonography or CT.

摘要

共有103例连续性胃腺癌患者接受了评估,采用超声检查、计算机断层扫描(CT)以及全身麻醉下的腹腔镜检查来检测恶性肿瘤的腹腔内扩散情况。组织学证实有转移的患者中,27例转移至肝脏,49例转移至淋巴结,13例直接转移至腹膜。所有检查方式对每种转移类型均显示出较高的特异性(92%-100%)。腹腔镜检查在检测肝转移、淋巴结转移和腹膜转移方面更为敏感;就肝转移而言,腹腔镜检查的相对性能最佳。超声检查和CT在检测淋巴结转移和腹膜转移方面尤其不佳。腹腔镜检查未出现显著的发病率和死亡率,其在胃癌术前分期方面比超声检查或CT更为准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验