Davies J, Chalmers A G, Sue-Ling H M, May J, Miller G V, Martin I G, Johnston D
Academic Unit of Surgery, General Infirmary at Leeds, UK.
Gut. 1997 Sep;41(3):314-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.41.3.314.
Much controversy exists as to the value of computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer, because of its limited ability to identify correctly lymph node (LN) metastases, invasion of adjacent organs, or hepatic and peritoneal metastases. Spiral CT scanners have a number of potential advantages over conventional scanners, including the absence of respiratory misregistration, image reconstruction smaller than scan collimation permitting overlapping slices and optimisation of intravenous contrast enhancement.
To compare the performance of spiral CT and operative assessment against formal (TNM) pathological staging.
A study of 105 consecutive patients who underwent both spiral CT and operative staging was performed. All CT scans were reviewed by a radiologist who commented on tumour location and size, evidence of adjacent organ invasion, lymph node metastases to both N1 and N2 nodes, and evidence of hepatic and peritoneal metastases. All patients underwent careful operative assessment at the time of surgery, along the lines suggested by Rohde and colleagues.
Spiral CT remained poor at identifying LN metastases to both N1 and N2 lymph nodes, with sensitivity ranging from 24 to 43%; specificity, however, was 100%. Operative staging was superior, with sensitivities between 84 and 94%, but specificity was much lower (63-74%). Spiral CT correctly detected 13 of 17 cases of invasion of either the colon or the mesocolon (sensitivity 76%) compared with 16 of 17 cases at operative staging (sensitivity 94%). Spiral CT correctly identified three of six cases with invasion of the pancreas (sensitivity 50%) compared with six of six cases on operative staging (sensitivity 100%). Spiral CT correctly identified 12 of 17 cases of peritoneal metastases (sensitivity 71%) and four of seven cases of hepatic metastases (sensitivity 57%).
Whilst spiral CT remains poor at identifying lymph node metastases, it correctly identified most cases with invasion of either the colon or the mesocolon and half the cases of pancreatic invasion. It was of value in detecting peritoneal metastases and some cases with hepatic metastases. At present, at Leeds General Infirmary spiral CT is performed routinely on all patients with gastric cancer and a selective staging laparoscopy policy is adopted in those patients in whom the status of the peritoneal cavity and liver is in doubt.
由于计算机断层扫描(CT)在正确识别胃癌术前分期中淋巴结(LN)转移、邻近器官侵犯或肝及腹膜转移方面能力有限,其在胃癌术前分期中的价值存在诸多争议。螺旋CT扫描仪与传统扫描仪相比有许多潜在优势,包括不存在呼吸配准错误、图像重建小于扫描准直允许重叠切片以及静脉内对比增强优化。
比较螺旋CT和手术评估与正式(TNM)病理分期的性能。
对105例连续接受螺旋CT和手术分期的患者进行了研究。所有CT扫描均由一名放射科医生进行复查,该医生对肿瘤位置和大小、邻近器官侵犯证据、N1和N2淋巴结的淋巴结转移以及肝和腹膜转移证据进行了评论。所有患者在手术时均按照罗德及其同事建议的方法进行了仔细的手术评估。
螺旋CT在识别N1和N2淋巴结的淋巴结转移方面仍然较差,敏感性范围为24%至43%;然而,特异性为100%。手术分期更优,敏感性在84%至94%之间,但特异性要低得多(63% - 74%)。螺旋CT正确检测出17例结肠或结肠系膜侵犯病例中的13例(敏感性76%),而手术分期为17例中的16例(敏感性94%)。螺旋CT正确识别出6例胰腺侵犯病例中的3例(敏感性50%),而手术分期为6例中的6例(敏感性100%)。螺旋CT正确识别出17例腹膜转移病例中的12例(敏感性71%)和7例肝转移病例中的4例(敏感性57%)。
虽然螺旋CT在识别淋巴结转移方面仍然较差,但它正确识别了大多数结肠或结肠系膜侵犯病例以及一半的胰腺侵犯病例。它在检测腹膜转移和一些肝转移病例方面具有价值。目前,在利兹总医院,对所有胃癌患者常规进行螺旋CT检查,对于那些腹膜腔和肝脏状况存疑的患者采用选择性分期腹腔镜检查策略。