Suppr超能文献

简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)在意大利99个重症监护病房(ICU)收治患者队列中的表现:来自意大利重症监护治疗评估组织(GiViTI)的结果 。 意大利重症监护治疗评估组织

The performance of SAPS II in a cohort of patients admitted to 99 Italian ICUs: results from GiViTI. Gruppo Italiano per la Valutazione degli interventi in Terapia Intensiva.

作者信息

Apolone G, Bertolini G, D'Amico R, Iapichino G, Cattaneo A, De Salvo G, Melotti R M

机构信息

GiViTI Coordinating Center, Istituto di Ricerche, Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1996 Dec;22(12):1368-78. doi: 10.1007/BF01709553.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the validity of SAPS II (new Simplified Acute Physiology Score) in a cohort of patients admitted to a large sample of Italian intensive care units (ICU).

DESIGN AND SETTING

The ability of the SAPS II scoring system to predict the probability of hospital mortality was assessed with calibration and discrimination measures obtained using published coefficients. A new logistic regression equation was then developed and further formal calibration and discrimination measures were estimated for the customized model.

PATIENTS

From the 2202 consecutive patients recruited during a 1-month period in 99 ICUs, a total of 1393 patients were included in this validation study.

RESULTS

When the parameters based on the standard model were applied, the expected probability of mortality did not fit those actually observed in the cohort (p < 0.001), although it showed satisfactory discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.80). Such lack of fit yields an overall under prediction of mortality (observed/expected ratio = 1.14) that reflects a uniform pattern across a preselected set of subgroups. Customization allowed new mortality estimates to be calculated, with satisfactory calibration (p = 0.82) and a more uniform pattern across subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

SAPS II maintained its validity in an independent sample of patients recruited in a large network of Italian ICUs only after appropriate adaptation (first-level customization). Whether the determinants of this relatively poor performance are related to differences in unmeasured case-mix, methods of application, or quality of care delivered is a matter for discussion that cannot be solved with the data presently available. However, these findings suggest that caution is warranted before implementing the standard SAPS II scoring system parameters outside formal research projects.

摘要

目的

评估简化急性生理学评分系统Ⅱ(SAPS II)在一大批意大利重症监护病房(ICU)收治患者队列中的有效性。

设计与背景

使用已发表的系数获得校准和鉴别测量值,评估SAPS II评分系统预测医院死亡率概率的能力。然后开发一个新的逻辑回归方程,并对定制模型估计进一步的正式校准和鉴别测量值。

患者

在99个ICU的1个月期间连续招募的2202例患者中,本验证研究共纳入1393例患者。

结果

应用基于标准模型的参数时,死亡率的预期概率与队列中实际观察到的概率不相符(p<0.001),尽管其显示出令人满意的鉴别力(受试者工作特征曲线下面积=0.80)。这种不相符导致死亡率总体预测不足(观察值/预期值比率=1.14),反映了在一组预先选定的亚组中的统一模式。定制允许计算新的死亡率估计值,具有令人满意的校准(p=0.82)以及亚组间更统一的模式。

结论

仅在进行适当调整(一级定制)后,SAPS II在意大利ICU大型网络招募的独立患者样本中保持其有效性。这种相对较差表现的决定因素是否与未测量的病例组合差异、应用方法或所提供护理的质量有关,是一个有待讨论的问题,无法用现有数据解决。然而,这些发现表明,在正式研究项目之外实施标准SAPS II评分系统参数之前,应谨慎行事。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验