Sicignano A, Carozzi C, Giudici D, Merli G, Arlati S, Pulici M
Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Oct;22(10):1048-51. doi: 10.1007/BF01699226.
To assess how the power of discrimination of a multipurpose severity score (Simplified Acute Physiology Score; SAPS) changes in relation to the length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU).
In order to compute the SAPS probability, a model derived from logistic regression was developed in a cohort of 8059 patients. Measures of calibration (goodness-of-fit statistics) and discrimination [receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and relative area under the curve (AUC)] were adopted in a developmental set (5389 patients) and a validation set (2670 patients), both randomly selected. Once the logit was developed and the model validated, the whole database (8059 patients) was again assembled. To evaluate the accuracy of first-day SAPS probability over time, area under the ROC curve was computed for each of the initial 10 days of ICU care and for day 15.
24 Italian ICUs.
A total of 8059 patients out of 10065 consecutive admissions over a period of 3 years (1990-1992) were included in this study. Patients whose SAPS was not correctly compiled (n = 687), patients younger than 18 years (n = 442), and patients whose LOS was less than 24 h (n = 877) were excluded from this analysis.
None.
The logistic model gave good results in terms of calibration and discrimination, both in the developmental set (goodness-of-fit: chi 2 = 9.24, p = 0.32; AUC = 0.79 +/- 0.01) and in the validation set (goodness-of-fit: chi 2 = 8.95, p = 0.537; AUC = 0.78 +/- 0.01). The AUC for the whole database showed a loss in discrimination closely related to LOS: 0.79 +/- 0.01 at a day 1 and 0.59 +/- 0.02 at day 15.
The logistic model that we developed meets high standards for discrimination and calibration. However, SAPS loses its discriminative power over time; accuracy of prediction is maintained at an acceptable level only in patients who stay in the ICU no longer than 5 days. The stay in the ICU represents a complex variable, which is not predictable, that influences the performance of SAPS on the first day.
评估多用途严重程度评分(简化急性生理学评分;SAPS)的鉴别力如何随重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)的变化而改变。
为了计算SAPS概率,在一个由8059例患者组成的队列中开发了一个源自逻辑回归的模型。在一个开发集(5389例患者)和一个验证集(2670例患者)中采用校准测量(拟合优度统计量)和鉴别力[受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线及曲线下相对面积(AUC)],这两个数据集均为随机选取。一旦开发出对数似然函数并验证了模型,就再次整合整个数据库(8059例患者)。为了评估首日SAPS概率随时间的准确性,计算了ICU护理最初10天中每一天以及第15天的ROC曲线下面积。
24家意大利ICU。
本研究纳入了1990 - 1992年3年期间连续收治的10065例患者中的8059例。未正确编制SAPS的患者(n = 687)、年龄小于18岁的患者(n = 442)以及住院时间少于24小时的患者(n = 877)被排除在本分析之外。
无。
逻辑模型在校准和鉴别力方面均取得了良好结果,在开发集(拟合优度:卡方 = 9.24,p = 0.32;AUC = 0.79 ± 0.01)和验证集(拟合优度:卡方 = 8.95,p = 0.537;AUC = 0.78 ± 0.01)中均如此。整个数据库的AUC显示鉴别力的丧失与住院时间密切相关:第1天为0.79 ± 0.01,第15天为0.59 ± 0.02。
我们开发的逻辑模型在鉴别力和校准方面达到了高标准。然而,SAPS的鉴别力会随时间丧失;仅在ICU住院时间不超过5天的患者中,预测准确性才维持在可接受水平。在ICU的住院时间是一个复杂且不可预测的变量,它会影响SAPS在首日的表现。