Kovács I, Papathomas T V, Yang M, Fehér A
Laboratory of Vision Research, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 24;93(26):15508-11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15508.
The prevalent view of binocular rivalry holds that it is a competition between the two eyes mediated by reciprocal inhibition among monocular neurons. This view is largely due to the nature of conventional rivalry-inducing stimuli, which are pairs of dissimilar images with coherent patterns within each eye's image. Is it the eye of origin or the coherency of patterns that determines perceptual alternations between coherent percepts in binocular rivalry? We break the coherency of conventional stimuli and replace them by complementary patchworks of intermingled rivalrous images. Can the brain unscramble the pieces of the patchwork arriving from different eyes to obtain coherent percepts? We find that pattern coherency in itself can drive perceptual alternations, and the patchworks are reassembled into coherent forms by most observers. This result is in agreement with recent neurophysiological and psychophysical evidence demonstrating that there is more to binocular rivalry than mere eye competition.
关于双眼竞争的普遍观点认为,它是由单眼神经元之间的相互抑制介导的两只眼睛之间的竞争。这种观点很大程度上归因于传统竞争诱导刺激的性质,这些刺激是每只眼睛图像内具有连贯图案的一对不同图像。在双眼竞争中,是图像的来源眼还是图案的连贯性决定了连贯感知之间的感知交替呢?我们打破了传统刺激的连贯性,并用相互交织的竞争图像的互补拼凑图案取而代之。大脑能否解开来自不同眼睛的拼凑图案碎片以获得连贯的感知呢?我们发现图案连贯性本身就能驱动感知交替,并且大多数观察者会将拼凑图案重新组合成连贯的形式。这一结果与最近的神经生理学和心理物理学证据一致,表明双眼竞争不仅仅是单纯的眼睛竞争。