Hartshorn K, Rovee-Collier C
Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
Dev Psychobiol. 1997 Jan;30(1):71-85.
In three experiments, we tested the generality and validity of prior evidence of delayed recognition, memory reactivation, and retrieval specificity at 6 months of age using a new operant task. In Experiment 1, the forgetting function was found to be 2 weeks but not 3, the same as previously obtained using the mobile conjugate reinforcement task. In Experiment 2, a reactivation treatment with the original cue (train set) in the original context (room in the home) recovered the memory but was ineffective when either was changed. These results also confirmed prior findings but expanded the manipulation of context to include the place where training occurred. Following a reactivation treatment, infants in Experiment 3a failed to recognize the original cue in a different context, as before, but generalized to a different cue in the original context. Because the latter test condition was novel, a comparison group was trained in the mobile task and tested with a different mobile in the original context 1 day after a reactivation treatment (Experiment 3b); this group failed to recognize the mobile. The disparity in these outcomes was attributed to the salience of features common to the two train sets. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that, for the same parameters of training and testing, memory performance at 6 months is task-independent.
在三项实验中,我们使用一种新的操作性任务,测试了6个月大婴儿延迟识别、记忆再激活和提取特异性先前证据的普遍性和有效性。在实验1中,发现遗忘函数为2周而非3周,这与先前使用移动共轭强化任务得出的结果相同。在实验2中,在原始情境(家中房间)中使用原始线索(训练集)进行再激活处理可恢复记忆,但当其中任何一个改变时则无效。这些结果也证实了先前的发现,但将情境的操作扩展到包括训练发生的地点。经过再激活处理后,实验3a中的婴儿像之前一样,在不同情境中无法识别原始线索,但在原始情境中能将其推广到不同线索。由于后一种测试条件是新颖的,因此设立了一个对照组,让其接受移动任务训练,并在再激活处理1天后在原始情境中用不同的移动装置进行测试(实验3b);该组未能识别该移动装置。这些结果的差异归因于两个训练集共有的特征的显著性。综合来看,这些发现表明,对于相同的训练和测试参数,6个月大婴儿的记忆表现与任务无关。