• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿记忆发展的连续性。

Continuities in infant memory development.

作者信息

Hill W L, Borovsky D, Rovee-Collier C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903.

出版信息

Dev Psychobiol. 1988 Jan;21(1):43-62. doi: 10.1002/dev.420210104.

DOI:10.1002/dev.420210104
PMID:3338627
Abstract

Fifty-five 6- to 7-month-old human infants were trained in an operant conditioning procedure, adapted from a procedure developed for 3-month-olds, in which kicks were reinforced by conjugate movement of a mobile. Retention was assessed in a simple forgetting paradigm (Expt. 1) or in a reactivation paradigm (Expt. 2) with either the training mobile or a different one serving as the retrieval cue. In Experiment 1, retention was tested 1, 7, 14, or 21 days after training. When the training and test mobiles were the same, infants exhibited virtually no forgetting for 14 days, but forgetting was complete by 21. When the training and test mobiles were different, infants exhibited no retention, discriminating the novel mobile for as long as they could remember the contingency. In Experiment 2, when the training mobile was presented as a reminder, the forgetting previously seen after 21 days was alleviated; when a different mobile was the reminder, it was not. These findings reveal that the efficacy of a reminder is predicted by the efficacy of that same stimulus in cuing the original memory 24 hr following training. Although the 6-month-olds learned more rapidly and remembered longer than infants half their age, their memory processing was described by the same basic principles.

摘要

55名6至7个月大的人类婴儿接受了操作性条件反射程序的训练,该程序改编自为3个月大婴儿开发的程序,其中婴儿的踢腿动作通过移动装置的共轭运动得到强化。在简单遗忘范式(实验1)或再激活范式(实验2)中评估记忆保持情况,训练时使用的移动装置或不同的移动装置作为检索线索。在实验1中,在训练后1天、7天、14天或21天测试记忆保持情况。当训练和测试使用的移动装置相同时,婴儿在14天内几乎没有遗忘,但到21天时遗忘完全。当训练和测试使用的移动装置不同时,婴儿没有表现出记忆保持,只要他们还记得这种关联,就会辨别出新的移动装置。在实验2中,当呈现训练时使用的移动装置作为提示时,之前在21天后出现的遗忘得到缓解;当使用不同的移动装置作为提示时,则没有缓解。这些发现表明,提示的效果由该相同刺激在训练后24小时提示原始记忆的效果所预测。尽管6个月大的婴儿比年龄只有他们一半的婴儿学习得更快、记忆得更久,但他们的记忆处理遵循相同的基本原理。

相似文献

1
Continuities in infant memory development.婴儿记忆发展的连续性。
Dev Psychobiol. 1988 Jan;21(1):43-62. doi: 10.1002/dev.420210104.
2
Expectancies and memory retrieval in three-month-old infants.三个月大婴儿的期望与记忆提取
Child Dev. 1984 Jun;55(3):936-43.
3
Specificity in the reactivation of infant memory.婴儿记忆再激活的特异性。
Dev Psychobiol. 1985 Nov;18(6):559-74. doi: 10.1002/dev.420180611.
4
Reactivation: priming forgotten memories in human infants.重新激活:唤醒人类婴儿遗忘的记忆。
Child Dev. 1982 Apr;53(2):516-23.
5
Contextual gating of memory retrieval.记忆检索的情境门控
Dev Psychobiol. 1989 Sep;22(6):533-52. doi: 10.1002/dev.420220602.
6
The organization of reactivated memory in infancy.婴儿期重新激活记忆的组织方式。
Child Dev. 1995 Jun;66(3):893-906.
7
Contextual constraints on memory retrieval at six months.六个月时记忆提取的情境限制
Child Dev. 1990 Oct;61(5):1569-83.
8
Retrieval difficulty and retention of reactivated memories over the first year of life.生命第一年中重新激活记忆的提取难度与保持情况。
Dev Psychobiol. 2003 Nov;43(3):216-29. doi: 10.1002/dev.10135.
9
A conditioning analysis of infant long-term memory.婴儿长期记忆的条件分析
Child Dev. 1979 Mar;50(1):152-62.
10
Timing effects of postevent information on infant memory.事件后信息对婴儿记忆的时间效应。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Oct;63(1):212-38. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0048.

引用本文的文献

1
A quarter century of research on infant contingency learning: Current and future directions.对婴儿应急学习的25年研究:现状与未来方向。
Infant Behav Dev. 2025 May 23;80:102068. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2025.102068.
2
Associative learning via eyeblink conditioning differs by age from infancy to adulthood.通过眨眼条件反射进行的联想学习在从婴儿期到成年期的不同年龄段存在差异。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Dec 16;2(1):118. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00176-4.
3
Neuroimaging the sleeping brain: Insight on memory functioning in infants and toddlers.神经影像学研究睡眠中的大脑:婴幼儿记忆功能的新见解。
Infant Behav Dev. 2020 Feb;58:101427. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2020.101427. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
4
Do infants retain the statistics of a statistical learning experience? Insights from a developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective.婴儿会保留统计学习经验的统计数据吗?来自发展认知神经科学视角的见解。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Jan 5;372(1711). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0054.
5
Long-term memory, forgetting, and deferred imitation in 12-month-old infants.12个月大婴儿的长期记忆、遗忘和延迟模仿
Dev Sci. 1999 Mar;2(1):102-113. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00060.
6
Deferred Imitation Across Changes in Context and Object: Memory and Generalization in 14-Month-Old Infants.跨情境和物体变化的延迟模仿:14个月大婴儿的记忆与泛化
Infant Behav Dev. 1996 Apr 1;19(2):241-251. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90023-5.
7
Learning to remember: the early ontogeny of episodic memory.学习记忆:情景记忆的早期个体发生
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Jul;9:12-29. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
8
Infant and adult visual attention during an imitation demonstration.模仿示范过程中的婴儿和成人视觉注意力。
Dev Psychobiol. 2014 May;56(4):770-82. doi: 10.1002/dev.21147. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
9
Remembering new words: integrating early memory development into word learning.记住新单词:将早期记忆发展融入单词学习中。
Front Psychol. 2013 Apr 1;4:151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00151. eCollection 2013.
10
Mismatching amodal redundancy inhibits operant learning in 5-month-old infants.不匹配的模态冗余抑制 5 个月大婴儿的操作性学习。
Infant Behav Dev. 2012 Jun;35(3):360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jun 19.