Amir N, McNally R J, Riemann B C, Burns J, Lorenz M, Mullen J T
Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19129, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):945-8. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00054-x.
Anxious individuals are slower at color-naming threat-related than nonthreat-related words in the emotional Stroop task. Recently, Mathews and Sebastian (1993, Cognition and Emotion, 7, 527-530) reported that this Stroop interference effect disappears when snake-fearful students are exposed to a snake while performing the color-naming task. In the present experiment, we had patients with social phobia and normal control subjects perform an emotional Stroop task under either low anxiety (i.e. upon entering the laboratory) or high anxiety (i.e. before giving a speech). Results indicated that Stroop interference for socially threatening words in the phobic group was suppressed under high anxiety. These findings may indicate that increased effort enables the subjects to suppress the interference produced in the Stroop task.
在情绪性斯特鲁普任务中,焦虑个体对与威胁相关的颜色命名比与非威胁相关的单词更慢。最近,马修斯和塞巴斯蒂安(1993年,《认知与情感》,第7卷,第527 - 530页)报告称,当怕蛇的学生在执行颜色命名任务时接触到蛇,这种斯特鲁普干扰效应就会消失。在本实验中,我们让社交恐惧症患者和正常对照组在低焦虑(即进入实验室时)或高焦虑(即演讲前)状态下执行情绪性斯特鲁普任务。结果表明,在高焦虑状态下,恐惧组对社交威胁性词语的斯特鲁普干扰受到抑制。这些发现可能表明,增加努力使受试者能够抑制斯特鲁普任务中产生的干扰。