Plonsky I, Zimmerberg J
Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biosphysics, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1855, USA.
J Cell Biol. 1996 Dec;135(6 Pt 2):1831-9. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.6.1831.
The formation of the fusion pore is the first detectable event in membrane fusion (Zimmerberg, J., R. Blumenthal, D.P. Sarkar, M. Curran, and S.J. Morris. 1994. J. Cell Biol. 127:1885-1894). To date, fusion pores measured in exocytosis and viral fusion have shared features that include reversible closure (flickering), highly fluctuating semistable stages, and a lag time of at least several seconds between the triggering and the pore opening. We investigated baculovirus GP64-induced Sf9 cell-cell fusion, triggered by external acid solution, using two different electrophysiological techniques: double whole-cell recording (for high time resolution, model-independent measurements), and the more conventional time-resolved admittance recordings. Both methods gave essentially the same results, thus validating the use of the admittance measurements for fusion pore conductance calculations. Fusion was first detected by abrupt pore formation with a wide distribution of initial conductance, centered around 1 nS. Often the initial fusion pore conductance was stable for many seconds. Fluctuations in semistable conductances were much less than those of other fusion pores. The waiting time distribution, measured between pH onset and initial pore appearance, fits best to a model with many (approximately 19) independent elements. Thus, unlike previously measured fusion pores, GP64-mediated pores do not flicker, can have large, stable initial pore conductances lasting up to a minute, and have typical lag times of < 1 s. These findings are consistent with a barrel-shaped model of an initial fusion pore consisting of five to eight GP64 trimers that is lined with lipid.
融合孔的形成是膜融合过程中首个可检测到的事件(齐默伯格,J.,R. 布卢门撒尔,D.P. 萨卡尔,M. 柯伦,以及 S.J. 莫里斯。1994 年。《细胞生物学杂志》127:1885 - 1894)。迄今为止,在胞吐作用和病毒融合过程中测量到的融合孔具有一些共同特征,包括可逆关闭(闪烁)、高度波动的半稳定阶段,以及触发与孔开放之间至少几秒的延迟时间。我们使用两种不同的电生理技术研究了由外部酸性溶液触发的杆状病毒 GP64 诱导的 Sf9 细胞 - 细胞融合:双全细胞记录(用于高时间分辨率、与模型无关的测量),以及更传统的时间分辨导纳记录。两种方法得出的结果基本相同,从而验证了使用导纳测量来计算融合孔电导的可行性。融合首先通过突然形成孔来检测,初始电导分布广泛,中心值约为 1 nS。通常,初始融合孔电导会稳定许多秒。半稳定电导的波动比其他融合孔小得多。在 pH 开始变化到初始孔出现之间测量的等待时间分布,最符合具有许多(约 19 个)独立元件的模型。因此,与之前测量的融合孔不同,GP64 介导的孔不会闪烁,可以具有持续长达一分钟的大且稳定的初始孔电导,并且典型延迟时间小于 1 秒。这些发现与由五到八个 GP64 三聚体组成的初始融合孔的桶状模型一致,该模型内衬脂质。