• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网:一个现代版的潘多拉魔盒?

The Internet: a modern Pandora's box?

作者信息

Mayer M, Till J E

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology and Statistics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 1996 Dec;5(6):568-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00439230.

DOI:10.1007/BF00439230
PMID:8993102
Abstract

Two different views of the Internet are presented. One is from the perspective of an author who has written a personal account of her own breast cancer experience, while the other is from the perspective of a cancer researcher who is interested in quality of life research. The article is written in a format that reflects the somewhat informal style of messages sent to Internet discussion groups. For better or worse, the Internet has arrived as a force in our lives, and medical information and support constitute two of its more important uses. Both authors agree that the novel medium of the Internet provides a unique opportunity to create a true partnership of health care providers and consumers.

摘要

文中呈现了两种对互联网的不同观点。一种观点来自一位撰写了自己乳腺癌经历个人记述的作者,另一种观点则来自一位对生活质量研究感兴趣的癌症研究人员。这篇文章采用的写作形式反映了发送到互联网讨论组的信息那种较为随意的风格。不管怎样,互联网已成为我们生活中的一股力量,医疗信息和支持是其更重要的两种用途。两位作者都认为,互联网这种新媒介为建立医疗服务提供者与消费者之间真正的伙伴关系提供了独特机会。

相似文献

1
The Internet: a modern Pandora's box?互联网:一个现代版的潘多拉魔盒?
Qual Life Res. 1996 Dec;5(6):568-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00439230.
2
How cancer survivors provide support on cancer-related Internet mailing lists.癌症幸存者如何在癌症相关的互联网邮件列表上提供支持。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 May 14;9(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e12.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Healthcare @ the speed of thought.医疗保健,与思维同步。
Integr Healthc Rep. 1999 May:1-14, 16-7.
6
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
7
Study on the potential for delay tolerant networks by health workers in low resource settings.在资源匮乏环境中卫生工作者对延迟容忍网络潜力的研究。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012 Sep;107(3):557-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
8
Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the Internet.乳腺癌在线交流:互联网上的支持与赋权
Women Health. 1997;26(1):65-84. doi: 10.1300/J013v26n01_05.
9
Digital health care--the convergence of health care and the Internet.数字医疗——医疗保健与互联网的融合。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2000 Apr;23(2):8-17. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200004000-00003.
10
A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet.后现代的潘多拉魔盒:互联网上的反疫苗错误信息。
Vaccine. 2010 Feb 17;28(7):1709-16. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical and Information Governance Considerations for Promoting Digital Social Interventions in Primary Care.在初级保健中推广数字社会干预措施的伦理与信息治理考量
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 27;25:e44886. doi: 10.2196/44886.
2
Peoples' attitude toward COVID-19 vaccine, acceptance, and social trust among African and Middle East countries.非洲和中东国家民众对新冠疫苗的态度、接受度及社会信任度。
Health Promot Perspect. 2021 May 19;11(2):171-178. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.21. eCollection 2021.
3
Studying Public Perception about Vaccination: A Sentiment Analysis of Tweets.

本文引用的文献

1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
A STOCHASTIC MODEL OF STEM CELL PROLIFERATION, BASED ON THE GROWTH OF SPLEEN COLONY-FORMING CELLS.基于脾集落形成细胞生长的干细胞增殖随机模型
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Jan;51(1):29-36. doi: 10.1073/pnas.51.1.29.
3
Discussion groups on the Internet: journaling.互联网上的讨论组:日志记录。
研究公众对疫苗接种的看法:对推文的情感分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 15;17(10):3464. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103464.
4
Representing vaccine misinformation using ontologies.使用本体来表示疫苗错误信息。
J Biomed Semantics. 2018 Aug 31;9(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13326-018-0190-0.
5
Vaccination persuasion online: a qualitative study of two provaccine and two vaccine-skeptical websites.线上疫苗接种劝导:对两个支持疫苗和两个对疫苗持怀疑态度网站的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 29;17(5):e133. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4153.
6
Evaluation of support groups for women with breast cancer: importance of the navigator role.乳腺癌女性支持小组的评估:导航员角色的重要性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 May 1;1:16. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-16.
7
Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities.互联网社区定性研究中的伦理问题。
BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1103-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103.
Can J Oncol. 1995 Sep;5(3):379-80.
4
The Internet's challenge to health care provision.互联网对医疗保健服务的挑战。
BMJ. 1996 Jan 6;312(7022):3-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7022.3.
5
The Internet and the Journal.
N Engl J Med. 1995 Jun 22;332(25):1709-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199506223322509.