• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎与胆石症:胆总管结石发生率是否存在差异?

Mild acute biliary pancreatitis vs cholelithiasis: are there differences in the rate of choledocholithiasis?

作者信息

Bertolín-Bernades Rosa, Sabater-Ortí Luis, Calvete-Chornet Julio, Camps-Vilata Bruno, Cassinello-Fernández Norberto, Oviedo-Bravo Miguel, Monco Purificación Ivorra-García, Cánovas-de Lucas Raúl, Lledó-Matoses Salvador

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hospital Clinico, University of Valencia, Avda Blasco Ibañez, no. 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Jul;11(7):875-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0148-5.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-007-0148-5
PMID:17458591
Abstract

The rate of choledocholithiasis at the time of elective surgery after mild acute biliary pancreatitis is still unclear because it decreases rapidly after the onset. The aims of this study are as follows: (1) To investigate whether the incidence of choledocholithiasis in mild biliary pancreatitis is higher than in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. (2) To evaluate the usefulness of intraoperative cholangiography in the diagnosis of unsuspected choledocholithiasis in mild pancreatitis. Prospective study including 130 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery and classified into two groups: mild biliary pancreatitis (n = 44) and symptomatic cholelithiasis (n = 86). Choledocholithiasis was evaluated by endoscopic cholangiopancreatography, magnetic resonance, and intraoperative cholangiography. Preoperatively, choledocholithiasis was identified in five patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and two with biliary pancreatitis (5.81 vs 4.54%; p = 0.472). In 117 cases (90%), intraoperative cholangiography was successfully performed, identifying unsuspected choledocholithiasis in five patients of the colelithiasis group and in three in the group of pancreatitis (5.81 vs 6.81%; p = 0.492). The total number of patients with choledocholithiasis in the whole series was 15 (11.5%); 11.6% in colelithiasis group vs 11.4% in biliary pancreatitis group; p = 0.605. The rate of choledocholithiasis was not significantly different between the groups of patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis and symptomatic cholelithiasis. Intraoperative cholangiography identified unsuspected choledocholithiasis in 6.81% of patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis.

摘要

轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎后择期手术时胆总管结石的发生率仍不明确,因为其在发病后迅速下降。本研究的目的如下:(1)调查轻度胆源性胰腺炎患者胆总管结石的发生率是否高于有症状胆结石患者。(2)评估术中胆管造影在诊断轻度胰腺炎中未被怀疑的胆总管结石的实用性。前瞻性研究纳入130例行腹腔镜手术的患者,分为两组:轻度胆源性胰腺炎组(n = 44)和有症状胆结石组(n = 86)。通过内镜逆行胰胆管造影、磁共振成像和术中胆管造影评估胆总管结石。术前,在86例有症状胆结石患者中有5例、44例胆源性胰腺炎患者中有2例被发现有胆总管结石(5.81%对4.54%;p = 0.472)。117例(90%)成功进行了术中胆管造影,在胆结石组5例患者和胰腺炎组3例患者中发现了未被怀疑的胆总管结石(5.81%对6.81%;p = 0.492)。整个系列中胆总管结石患者总数为15例(11.5%);胆结石组为11.6%,胆源性胰腺炎组为11.4%;p = 0.605。轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎患者组和有症状胆结石患者组之间胆总管结石的发生率无显著差异。术中胆管造影在6.81%的轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎患者中发现了未被怀疑的胆总管结石。

相似文献

1
Mild acute biliary pancreatitis vs cholelithiasis: are there differences in the rate of choledocholithiasis?轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎与胆石症:胆总管结石发生率是否存在差异?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Jul;11(7):875-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0148-5.
2
Intraoperative cholangiography versus magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis: A prospective study in a second-level hospital.轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎患者术中胆管造影与磁共振胰胆管造影的比较:二级医院的前瞻性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(44):e12976. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012976.
3
[Endoscopic cholangiography in mild acute biliary pancreatitis: when and for whom?].[轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎的内镜胆管造影:时机及适用人群?]
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2002 Apr-Jun;67(2):87-92.
4
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in biliary pancreatitis.胆源性胰腺炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Am Surg. 1994 Jan;60(1):40-3.
5
[Usefulness of endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy in patients with biliary lithiasis].[内镜胆管造影术和括约肌切开术在胆石症患者中的应用价值]
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2004 Oct-Dec;69(4):217-25.
6
[Celioscopic treatment of cholelithiasis in benign acute biliary pancreatitis].[腹腔镜治疗良性急性胆源性胰腺炎中的胆石症]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1995 Oct;19(10):747-50.
7
Early laparoendoscopic rendezvous for acute biliary pancreatitis: preliminary results.早期腹腔镜内会师术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎:初步结果。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):371-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0580-6. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
8
Cholecystectomy 7 days vs 4 weeks after mild biliary pancreatitis; looking a decrease the incidence of persistent choledocholithiasis and ERCP: A multicentric randomized clinical trial.胆囊炎 7 天与 4 周后行胆囊切除术治疗轻度胆源性胰腺炎;观察持续胆石症和 ERCP 发生率的降低:一项多中心随机临床试验。
Int J Surg. 2022 Feb;98:106207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106207. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
9
Combined endoscopic treatment for cholelithiasis associated with choledocholithiasis.内镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jul;19(7):910-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9314-3. Epub 2005 May 3.
10
A prospective experience with selective cholangiography.选择性胆管造影的前瞻性经验。
Am Surg. 1998 Jul;64(7):654-8; discussion 658-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidental Intraoperatively Detected Choledocholithiasis: A General Surgeon's Approach to Management.术中偶然发现的胆总管结石:普通外科医生的处理方法
Cureus. 2023 Oct 25;15(10):e47634. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47634. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.腹腔镜胆道手术临床应用的SAGES指南。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2368-86. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1268-7. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
3
Cholecystectomy and sphincterotomy in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis in Sweden 1988 - 2003: a nationwide register study.

本文引用的文献

1
Algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis.急性胆源性胰腺炎的诊断与治疗算法
Scand J Surg. 2005;94(2):124-9. doi: 10.1177/145749690509400208.
2
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detects common bile duct stones in resolving gallstone pancreatitis.磁共振胰胆管造影术能准确检测出正在消退的胆石性胰腺炎患者的胆总管结石。
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jun;200(6):869-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.028.
3
The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US.
1988 - 2003年瑞典轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎患者的胆囊切除术和括约肌切开术:一项全国性登记研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct 23;9:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-80.
4
Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis: the protective role of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy.复发性急性胆源性胰腺炎:胆囊切除术和内镜下括约肌切开术的保护作用
Surg Endosc. 2009 May;23(5):950-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0339-0. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
疑似胆源性胰腺炎中胆管结石的检测:磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)、内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)及胆管内超声检查的比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 May;100(5):1051-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41057.x.
4
UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis.英国急性胰腺炎管理指南。
Gut. 2005 May;54 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii1-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.057026.
5
The role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of patients with gallstone pancreatitis.磁共振胰胆管造影在胆囊结石性胰腺炎患者管理中的作用。
Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):119-24. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000149509.77666.94.
6
Recurrence of acute gallstone pancreatitis and relationship with cholecystectomy or endoscopic sphincterotomy.急性胆石性胰腺炎的复发及其与胆囊切除术或内镜下括约肌切开术的关系。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Dec;99(12):2417-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40896.x.
7
Role of ERCP in the management of predicted mild acute biliary pancreatitis.
Asian J Surg. 2003 Oct;26(4):197-201. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60302-X.
8
Spontaneous passage of bile duct stones: frequency of occurrence and relation to clinical presentation.胆管结石的自然排出:发生率及其与临床表现的关系
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003 May;85(3):174-7. doi: 10.1308/003588403321661325.
9
Selective cholangiography in 600 patients undergoing cholecystectomy with 5-year follow-up for residual bile duct stones.对600例行胆囊切除术的患者进行选择性胆管造影,并对残余胆管结石进行5年随访。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003 May;85(3):167-73. doi: 10.1308/003588403321661316.
10
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without routine operative cholangiography does not result in significant problems related to retained stones.不进行常规术中胆管造影的腹腔镜胆囊切除术不会导致与残留结石相关的重大问题。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Apr;16(4):592-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9158-7. Epub 2001 Dec 31.