MacIntyre N R, Cheng K C, McConnell R
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Chest. 1997 Jan;111(1):188-93. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.1.188.
Mechanical ventilation in patients with obstructive airway disease (OAD) is associated with the development of dynamic hyperinflation and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi). One of the effects of this form of PEEPi is to act as an inspiratory threshold load that can produce ineffective breath triggering, dyspnea, and muscle fatigue. Recently it has been shown that applying PEEP in the ventilator circuit can reduce this imposed triggering load. We wished to investigate this further by studying patients with OAD being weaned with pressure support (PS) ventilation. Our first objective was to determine the prevalence and magnitude of this form of PEEPi in OAD patients who were clinically judged to be capable of triggering mechanical ventilatory breaths. Our second objective was to attempt to reduce the triggering load by applying circuit PEEP and then observe the response of patient-ventilator interactions during the patient-triggered, pressure-limited PS breath.
Thirteen random patients with OAD who were receiving PS ventilation were studied by measuring airway pressures, airway gas flow, baseline esophageal pressure, esophageal pressure time products (PTP), and esophageal pressure changes before ventilator gas delivery began (delta Pes taken to represent PEEPi). Measurements were made at baseline and after stepwise increases in circuit PEEP up to the PEEPi.
We found measurable PEEPi in all patients (average +/- SD of 9.54 +/- 4.3 cm H2O) and it was > 10 cm H2O in seven patients. As would be predicted, we observed progressive reductions in PEEPi as applied PEEP was given. We also observed that the component of patient effort (PTP) related to overcoming PEEPi also decreased, but the PTP related to tidal volume (VT) did not. The VT associated with the set PS thus did not change with application of PEEP, nor did the breathing frequency.
PEEPi is common in OAD patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support. The imposed triggering load from PEEPi can be offset to large extent by circuit PEEP approaching the baseline PEEPi. Although total patient effort substantially falls with applied PEEP, the patient effort that combine with PS to effect VT does not.
阻塞性气道疾病(OAD)患者的机械通气与动态肺过度充气和内源性呼气末正压(PEEPi)的发生有关。这种形式的PEEPi的作用之一是作为吸气阈值负荷,可导致无效的呼吸触发、呼吸困难和肌肉疲劳。最近有研究表明,在呼吸机回路中应用PEEP可降低这种强加的触发负荷。我们希望通过研究接受压力支持(PS)通气撤机的OAD患者来进一步探讨这一问题。我们的首要目标是确定在临床判断能够触发机械通气呼吸的OAD患者中这种形式的PEEPi的患病率和严重程度。我们的第二个目标是尝试通过应用回路PEEP来降低触发负荷,然后观察患者触发的压力限制PS呼吸过程中患者-呼吸机相互作用的反应。
对13例接受PS通气的随机OAD患者进行研究,测量气道压力、气道气体流量、基线食管压力、食管压力时间乘积(PTP)以及呼吸机气体输送开始前的食管压力变化(用ΔPes代表PEEPi)。在基线时以及将回路PEEP逐步增加至PEEPi后进行测量。
我们发现所有患者均存在可测量的PEEPi(平均±标准差为9.54±4.3 cmH₂O),7例患者的PEEPi>10 cmH₂O。正如预期的那样,随着应用PEEP的增加,我们观察到PEEPi逐渐降低。我们还观察到与克服PEEPi相关的患者用力成分(PTP)也降低了,但与潮气量(VT)相关的PTP没有变化。因此,与设定的PS相关的VT并未随PEEP的应用而改变,呼吸频率也没有改变。
PEEPi在接受机械通气支持的OAD患者中很常见。接近基线PEEPi的回路PEEP可在很大程度上抵消PEEPi强加的触发负荷。尽管随着应用PEEP患者的总用力显著下降,但与PS共同作用以实现VT的患者用力并未下降。