Meisenberg B R, Miller W E, McMillan R, Callaghan M, Sloan C, Brehm T, Kosty M P, Kroener J, Longmire R, Saven A, Piro L D
Ida M. and Cecil H. Green Cancer Center, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jan;15(1):11-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.11.
A prospective study to determine the feasibility of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem-cell rescue (ASCR) in the outpatient setting.
One hundred thirteen consecutive patients underwent 165 cycles of HDC/ASCR for a variety of malignancies. HDC regimens were disease-specific. Initially, patients were hospitalized for HDC, discharged on completion, and maintained as outpatients unless toxicities required rehospitalization (subtotal outpatient transplantation [STOT]). Once this was established as safe, a total outpatient transplant (TOT) program was developed in which patients received all of the HDC, as well as supportive care, as outpatients. Patients who declined the outpatient programs received the same HDC and supportive care as inpatients.
In 140 of 165 (85%) HDC cycles, patients agreed to participate in one of the outpatient transplant programs. Five patients in the STOT program could not be discharged from the hospital because of toxicities that developed during HDC; thus, 135 patients were monitored the outpatient setting, 95 (70%) of whom were never readmitted. The mean +/- SEM total hospital length of stay (LOS), including all readmissions and excess days after chemotherapy, was 18.33 +/- 5.06 days for patients who refused the outpatient program, 8.22 +/- 5.76 days for patients in the STOT program, and 2.81 +/- 7.66 days for those in the TOT program (P < .001). One treatment-related death occurred in each treatment setting: day 120 inpatient, day 17 STOT, and day 110 TOT.
Outpatient management of HDC/ASCR is safe and acceptable for the vast majority of patients. The STOT program resulted in significant reduction in hospital LOS, while the TOT program appears equally safe and further reduces LOS. Hospitalization for HDC/ASCR is unnecessary in most patients.
一项前瞻性研究,以确定在门诊环境中进行高剂量化疗(HDC)和自体干细胞救援(ASCR)的可行性。
113例连续患者因各种恶性肿瘤接受了165个周期的HDC/ASCR。HDC方案是针对特定疾病的。最初,患者因HDC住院,完成后出院,并作为门诊患者进行维持治疗,除非毒性反应需要再次住院(部分门诊移植[STOT])。一旦确定这是安全的,就制定了一个完全门诊移植(TOT)计划,其中患者作为门诊患者接受所有的HDC以及支持性治疗。拒绝门诊计划的患者接受与住院患者相同的HDC和支持性治疗。
在165个HDC周期中的140个(85%)中,患者同意参与其中一个门诊移植计划。STOT计划中的5名患者因HDC期间出现的毒性反应而无法出院;因此,135名患者在门诊环境中接受监测,其中95名(70%)从未再次入院。拒绝门诊计划的患者的平均±标准误总住院天数(LOS),包括所有再次入院和化疗后的额外天数,为18.33±5.06天,STOT计划中的患者为8.22±5.76天,TOT计划中的患者为2.81±7.66天(P<.001)。每种治疗环境中都发生了1例与治疗相关的死亡:住院患者第120天,STOT患者第17天,TOT患者第110天。
对于绝大多数患者,HDC/ASCR的门诊管理是安全且可接受的。STOT计划显著缩短了住院LOS,而TOT计划似乎同样安全并进一步缩短了LOS。大多数患者无需因HDC/ASCR住院。