Velicer W F, Martin R A, Collins L M
Cancer Prevention Research Center, University of Rhode Island, Kingston 02881-0808, USA.
Addiction. 1996 Dec;91 Suppl:S197-209.
Assessing outcome is a critical problem for the study of addictive behaviors. Traditional approaches often lack power and sensitivity. Latent Transition Analysis is an alternative procedure that is applicable to categorical latent variable models such as stage models. The method involves four different types of parameters, each of which may be relevant to different research questions. Two examples that employ the Stages of Change construct are used to illustrate the method. In the first example, three different models of longitudinal change are compared. In the second example, the effects of an expert system intervention for smoking is compared to a control condition. The method permits the investigation of a series of specific comparisons: (1) the effectiveness of the intervention for individuals in different stages can be assessed; (2) the effectiveness of the intervention can be evaluated for different time intervals; and (3) the effects of intervention on both progression through the stages and regression through the stages or relapse can be assessed. Other potential applications of the method are also discussed.
评估结果是成瘾行为研究中的一个关键问题。传统方法往往缺乏效力和敏感性。潜在转变分析是一种适用于诸如阶段模型等分类潜在变量模型的替代程序。该方法涉及四种不同类型的参数,每种参数可能与不同的研究问题相关。使用两个采用改变阶段结构的例子来说明该方法。在第一个例子中,比较了三种不同的纵向变化模型。在第二个例子中,将专家系统干预吸烟的效果与对照条件进行了比较。该方法允许进行一系列具体比较:(1)可以评估干预对处于不同阶段个体的有效性;(2)可以针对不同时间间隔评估干预的有效性;(3)可以评估干预对通过各阶段的进展以及通过各阶段的回归或复发的影响。还讨论了该方法的其他潜在应用。