Suppr超能文献

维拉帕米 - 奎尼丁与地高辛 - 奎尼丁在急诊科治疗阵发性心房颤动中的疗效比较

Effectiveness of verapamil-quinidine versus digoxin-quinidine in the emergency department treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Innes G D, Vertesi L, Dillon E C, Metcalfe C

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Jan;29(1):126-34. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70318-4.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative effectiveness of a verapamil-quinidine sequential combination versus digoxin-quinidine in the emergency department treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

METHOD

This prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial involved patients, aged 18 to 75 years, with new-onset (< 48 hours) atrial fibrillation who presented to a community-based urban hospital with an annual ED census of 65,000. Exclusion criteria included ventricular response rate lower than 100 or higher than 200 beats/minute, allergy to study drugs, hypotension with evidence of end-organ hypoperfusion, and conduction abnormalities. Consenting patients were randomly assigned to receive rapid digitalization (1.0 mg over 2 hours) or i.v. verapamil (sequential 5-mg boluses up to 20 mg). After ventricular rate was controlled (< 100 beats/minute), oral quinidine (200 mg) was initiated and repeated every 2 hours until conversion to normal sinus rhythm (NSR) occurred, until 1 g of quinidine was administered, or until adverse effects supervened. Heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac rhythm, time to conversion, and adverse effects were documented.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients received the study drugs. Three were withdrawn, leaving 19 in the verapamil-quinidine (VER-Q) group and 22 in the digoxin-quinidine (DIG-Q) group. Sixteen patients (84%) in the VER-Q group and 10 (45%) in the DIG-Q group converted to NSR within 6 hours (P < .02). Mean time to conversion (+/-SD) was 185 +/- 146 minutes for VER-Q and 368 +/- 386 minutes for DIG-Q patients (P = NS). Twelve VER-Q patients (63%) and 6 DIG-Q patients (27%) were discharged from the ED (P < .05). Minor adverse effects were more common in the VER-Q group. No mortality or significant morbidity occurred.

CONCLUSION

The sequential combination of verapamil and quinidine, in the doses studied, is an effective treatment for PAF and is superior to digoxin-quinidine. Digoxin should no longer be considered the treatment of choice for uncomplicated PAF.

摘要

研究目的

确定维拉帕米 - 奎尼丁序贯联合用药与地高辛 - 奎尼丁在急诊科治疗阵发性心房颤动(PAF)中的相对疗效。

方法

这项前瞻性、双盲、随机、对照试验纳入了年龄在18至75岁之间、新发(<48小时)心房颤动且就诊于一家年急诊科普查量为65000人次的社区城市医院的患者。排除标准包括心室反应率低于100次/分钟或高于200次/分钟、对研究药物过敏、伴有终末器官灌注不足证据的低血压以及传导异常。同意参与的患者被随机分配接受快速洋地黄化(2小时内给予1.0毫克)或静脉注射维拉帕米(依次给予5毫克推注直至20毫克)。在心室率得到控制(<100次/分钟)后,开始口服奎尼丁(200毫克),每2小时重复一次,直至转为正常窦性心律(NSR)、给予1克奎尼丁或出现不良反应。记录心率、血压、心律、转复时间及不良反应。

结果

44例患者接受了研究药物治疗。3例退出研究,维拉帕米 - 奎尼丁(VER - Q)组剩余19例,地高辛 - 奎尼丁(DIG - Q)组剩余22例。VER - Q组16例患者(84%)和DIG - Q组10例患者(45%)在6小时内转为NSR(P <.02)。VER - Q组患者转复的平均时间(±标准差)为185±146分钟,DIG - Q组为368±386分钟(P =无显著性差异)。12例VER - Q组患者(63%)和6例DIG - Q组患者(27%)从急诊科出院(P <.05)。轻微不良反应在VER - Q组更为常见。未发生死亡或严重并发症。

结论

在所研究的剂量下,维拉帕米和奎尼丁序贯联合用药是治疗PAF的有效方法,且优于地高辛 - 奎尼丁。地高辛不应再被视为单纯PAF的首选治疗药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验