Featherstone J D
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of California-San Francisco, USA.
Dent Mater. 1996 May;12(3):194-7. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80021-2.
The objectives of this review are to compare the models that are used to simulate the caries process in cardiology research and to suggest how these models might be used to assess caries-inhibitory properties of dental materials. Available caries-simulation models fall into the following classifications: 1) in vitro demineralization using acid buffers, 2) in vitro demineralization using bacterially generated acids, 3) in vitro demineralization/remineralization using a pH-cycling system, 4) an artificial mouth where a bacterially generated acid challenge is interspersed with a "saliva" treatment, 5) in vivo animal model (generally with rats), 6) in situ demineralization and/or remineralization using enamel or dentin blocks or slices in the human mouth, and 7) in vivo studies using teeth scheduled for extraction in the human mouth. Most dental materials studies have used simple in vitro demineralization models or component release experiments, each of which is inadequate to answer the questions that are being asked about the caries-inhibitory properties of the material being tested. Experimental methods must be chosen with care to ensure that the material to be tested is examined in an appropriate mode. The ultimate goal is to correctly predict clinical outcomes. The design or redesign of a model must eventually be tied to documented clinical outcomes to improve the model and allow for future successful development of new materials.
本综述的目的是比较用于模拟心脏病学研究中龋齿过程的模型,并提出如何利用这些模型评估牙科材料的防龋性能。现有的龋齿模拟模型可分为以下几类:1)使用酸性缓冲液的体外脱矿;2)使用细菌产生的酸的体外脱矿;3)使用pH循环系统的体外脱矿/再矿化;4)人工口腔,其中细菌产生的酸攻击穿插着“唾液”处理;5)体内动物模型(一般用大鼠);6)使用人牙釉质或牙本质块或切片在人口腔中进行的原位脱矿和/或再矿化;7)使用计划在人口腔中拔除的牙齿进行的体内研究。大多数牙科材料研究使用简单的体外脱矿模型或成分释放实验,而这两种方法都不足以回答关于被测材料防龋性能的问题。必须谨慎选择实验方法,以确保被测材料以适当的方式进行检测。最终目标是正确预测临床结果。模型的设计或重新设计最终必须与已记录的临床结果相关联,以改进模型,并为未来新材料的成功开发提供支持。