Kraft S K, Marrero D G, Lazaridis E N, Fineberg N, Qiu C, Clark C M
Diabetes Research and Training Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Arch Fam Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;6(1):29-37. doi: 10.1001/archfami.6.1.29.
Diabetic retinopathy is a costly and prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus.
To assess primary care physicians' self-reported practice patterns for the screening and detection of diabetic retinopathy relative to published guidelines.
All primary care physicians (defined as general internists, family practitioners, and general practitioners) in Indiana were identified and surveyed using a mailed questionnaire. Of 2390 physicians, 1508 (63%) responded and were determined to be eligible. Of these 1508 physicians, 1058 (70%) completed all or some of the eye care-related questions. For each eye care practice, physicians were asked to specify the proportion of patients to which the practice was applied and the frequency (eg, every 3 months) with which the behavior was performed, if appropriate. Physicians were also asked to distinguish between patients with type I (insulin-dependent) and type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus for each practice behavior.
Physicians' responses were classified as "high," "moderate," or "low" based on the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Forty-five percent of the physicians' responses were classified as high for referring all of their patients with type I diabetes mellitus to an eye care specialist annually as were 35% of the physicians' responses for referring their patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Fewer physicians reported high levels of routine in-office funduscopic examination. No relationship was found between the extent to which physicians performed an in-office funduscopic examination and patterns of referral to eye care specialists. Logistic regression analysis suggested that recent graduates and general internists are most likely to report behavior that is considered high (P < .05).
The diabetic retinopathy-related practice patterns of primary care physicians in Indiana differ significantly from published guidelines.
糖尿病视网膜病变是糖尿病一种代价高昂且普遍存在的并发症。
评估基层医疗医生自我报告的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查和检测实践模式与已发表指南的对比情况。
确定印第安纳州所有基层医疗医生(定义为普通内科医生、家庭医生和全科医生),并通过邮寄问卷进行调查。在2390名医生中,1508名(63%)回复并被确定符合条件。在这1508名医生中,1058名(70%)完成了全部或部分与眼部护理相关的问题。对于每种眼部护理实践,要求医生说明该实践应用于患者的比例以及(如适用)该行为执行的频率(例如每3个月)。还要求医生针对每种实践行为区分1型(胰岛素依赖型)和2型(非胰岛素依赖型)糖尿病患者。
根据美国糖尿病协会指南,医生的回复被分类为“高”“中”或“低”。45%的医生将每年把所有1型糖尿病患者转诊至眼科护理专家的回复分类为高,35%的医生将2型糖尿病患者转诊的回复分类为高。报告进行高水平常规诊室眼底检查的医生较少。未发现医生进行诊室眼底检查的程度与转诊至眼科护理专家的模式之间存在关联。逻辑回归分析表明,刚毕业的医生和普通内科医生最有可能报告被视为高水平的行为(P < .05)。
印第安纳州基层医疗医生与糖尿病视网膜病变相关的实践模式与已发表指南存在显著差异。