Ahmed S M, Maurana C A, Engle J A, Uddin D E, Glaus K D
Division of Community-oriented Studies, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Fam Med. 1997 Jan;29(1):42-4.
Determining authorship for publications is often a difficult process, even more so when individuals from several disciplines collaborate with community organizations to conduct projects. Although multidisciplinary and community-academic partnerships provide fertile ground for publication efforts, disputes about authorship and ownership of data may hinder efforts to disseminate information. This article describes a process for dealing with authorship in multi-professional collaborations. It provides an authorship scale, similar to a neonatal Apgar scale, to determine order of authorship in multi-professional projects. Key components or activities in the process of authorship are identified, and points are assigned to each component in proportion to an investigator's level of activity in each component/activity. Scores are summed and can range from 1 to 35 for each author. The order of authorship is then determined by the relative score of each participant.
确定出版物的作者身份往往是一个困难的过程，当来自多个学科的人员与社区组织合作开展项目时更是如此。尽管多学科和社区 - 学术伙伴关系为发表成果提供了肥沃的土壤，但关于作者身份和数据所有权的争议可能会阻碍信息传播的努力。本文描述了一种处理多专业合作中作者身份问题的流程。它提供了一种类似于新生儿阿氏评分的作者身份量表，以确定多专业项目中的作者顺序。确定了作者身份过程中的关键组成部分或活动，并根据研究者在每个组成部分/活动中的参与程度为每个部分分配分数。对分数进行汇总，每位作者的得分范围为1至35分。然后根据每位参与者的相对分数确定作者顺序。
