• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一份关于身体活动的新问卷的相对效度和可重复性。

Relative validity and repeatability of a new questionnaire on physical activity.

作者信息

Pols M A, Peeters P H, Ocké M C, Bueno-de-Mesquita H B, Slimani N, Kemper H C, Collette H J

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Prev Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.9995.

DOI:10.1006/pmed.1996.9995
PMID:9010896
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A physical activity questionnaire was developed with the aim to estimate usual individual daily energy expenditure. The questionnaire focused on the number of hours usually spent on various activities. In a pilot study it was tested for repeatability and validity in a population of 126 Dutch adults (64 men, 62 women).

METHODS

For assessment of repeatability the questionnaire was administered three times during the course of 1 year. A four-times-repeated 3-day activity diary was used as a reference instrument to evaluate validity.

RESULTS

Differences in mean energy expenditure among repeated administrations of the questionnaire were small and not significant. Spearman's test-retest correlation coefficients for total energy expenditure for men were 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.85] and 0.70 (95% CI 0.54-0.81) at 5 and 11 months, respectively, and for women were 0.58 (95% CI 0.36-0.74) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.54-0.82). There was a significant trend showing increasing mean diary energy expenditure for successive tertiles of questionnaire energy expenditure. The correlation between the questionnaire and the diary was 0.66 (95% CI 0.49-0.78) for men and 0.43 (95% CI 0.18-0.63) for women.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that this questionnaire is a useful tool for estimating energy expenditure in epidemiological studies.

摘要

背景

开发了一份体力活动问卷,旨在估算个体日常的能量消耗。该问卷聚焦于通常花在各种活动上的小时数。在一项试点研究中,对126名荷兰成年人(64名男性,62名女性)进行了重复性和有效性测试。

方法

为评估重复性,在1年时间内对问卷进行了3次发放。使用一份重复4次的3天活动日记作为评估有效性的参考工具。

结果

问卷重复发放期间,平均能量消耗的差异较小且无统计学意义。男性总能量消耗的Spearman重测相关系数在5个月和11个月时分别为0.76[95%置信区间(CI)0.63 - 0.85]和0.70(95%CI 0.54 - 0.81),女性分别为0.58(95%CI 0.36 - 0.74)和0.71(95%CI 0.54 - 0.82)。对于问卷能量消耗的连续三分位数,活动日记的平均能量消耗呈现出显著的上升趋势。问卷与活动日记的相关性,男性为0.66(95%CI 0.49 - 0.78),女性为0.43(95%CI 0.18 - 0.63)。

结论

得出结论,该问卷是流行病学研究中估算能量消耗的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Relative validity and repeatability of a new questionnaire on physical activity.一份关于身体活动的新问卷的相对效度和可重复性。
Prev Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.9995.
2
Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study: HUNT 1.挪威北特伦德拉格郡健康研究(HUNT 1)中自我报告的身体活动的可靠性和有效性。
Scand J Public Health. 2008 Jan;36(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/1403494807085373.
3
Testing an adaptation of the EPIC physical activity questionnaire in Portuguese adults: a validation study that assesses the seasonal bias of self-report.在葡萄牙成年人中测试EPIC体力活动问卷的一个改编版本:一项评估自我报告季节性偏差的验证研究。
Ann Hum Biol. 2010 Apr;37(2):185-97. doi: 10.3109/03014460903341836.
4
A quantitative survey to measure energy expenditure in midlife women.一项测量中年女性能量消耗的定量调查。
J Nurs Meas. 1993 Spring;1(1):29-40.
5
[Development of a Hebrew questionnaire to be used in epidemiological studies to assess physical fitness--validation against sub maximal stress test and predicted VO2max].[用于流行病学研究以评估体能的希伯来语问卷的开发——与次极量应激测试和预测的最大摄氧量进行验证]
Harefuah. 2004 Aug;143(8):566-72, 623.
6
Self-reported confidence in recall as a predictor of validity and repeatability of physical activity questionnaire data.自我报告的回忆信心作为身体活动问卷数据有效性和可重复性的预测指标。
Epidemiology. 2009 May;20(3):433-41. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181931539.
7
Occupational energy expenditure and leisure-time physical activity.职业能量消耗与休闲时间的身体活动。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2005;18(4):351-6.
8
Validity and reliability of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) in Japanese elderly people.老年人身体活动量表(PASE)在日本老年人中的效度和信度
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2008 Sep;8(3):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2008.00463.x.
9
Validity and repeatability of a modified Baecke questionnaire on physical activity.改良版贝克身体活动问卷的有效性和可重复性
Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Apr;24(2):381-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/24.2.381.
10
[Study on the reliability and validity of international physical activity questionnaire (Chinese Vision, IPAQ)].[国际体力活动问卷(中文版,IPAQ)的信效度研究]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Mar;25(3):265-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between Alcohol Consumption and Body Composition in Russian Adults and Patients Treated for Alcohol-Related Disorders: The Know Your Heart Cross-Sectional Study.俄罗斯成年人饮酒与身体成分的关系及与酒精相关障碍治疗患者:了解你的心脏横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 7;20(4):2905. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042905.
2
Questionnaires measuring movement behaviours in adults and older adults: Content description and measurement properties. A systematic review.成人和老年人运动行为测量问卷:内容描述和测量特性。系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 11;17(3):e0265100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265100. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of Self-Reported and Device-Based Measured Physical Activity Using Measures of Stability, Reliability, and Validity in Adults and Children.
比较成年人和儿童使用稳定性、可靠性和有效性测量指标的自我报告和基于设备的身体活动测量。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 10;21(8):2672. doi: 10.3390/s21082672.
4
Pre- to postdiagnosis leisure-time physical activity and prognosis in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.绝经后乳腺癌幸存者诊断前后的休闲时间体力活动与预后。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Nov 7;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1206-0.
5
Aging-related trajectories of lung function in the general population-The Doetinchem Cohort Study.一般人群中与衰老相关的肺功能轨迹:多廷赫姆队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 May 16;13(5):e0197250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197250. eCollection 2018.
6
A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.一项关于成年人身体活动测量技术的综述系统评价:DEDIPAC 研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Feb 8;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0636-2.
7
A Prospective Cluster-Randomized Trial of Telehealth Coaching to Promote Bone Health and Nutrition in Deployed Soldiers.一项针对远程医疗教练促进部署士兵骨骼健康和营养的前瞻性集群随机试验。
Healthcare (Basel). 2014 Dec 18;2(4):505-15. doi: 10.3390/healthcare2040505.
8
A physical activity questionnaire: reproducibility and validity.一份体力活动问卷:可重复性和有效性。
J Sports Sci Med. 2007 Dec 1;6(4):505-18. eCollection 2007.
9
Psychometric Evaluation of the Timeline Followback for Exercise among College Students.大学生运动时间线追溯法的心理测量评估
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2012 Nov;13(6):779-788. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
10
Patient-reported physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review of content and format.患者报告的体力活动问卷:内容和格式的系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Mar 13;10:28. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-28.