Suppr超能文献

[自动滴定持续气道正压通气系统对睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者睡眠及呼吸的影响]

[Effect of automatically titrated CPAP systems on sleep and respiration in sleep apnea syndrome].

作者信息

Hoster M, Schlenker E, Rühle K H

机构信息

Klinik Ambrock, Klinik für Pneumologie, Hagen, Deutschland.

出版信息

Wien Med Wochenschr. 1996;146(13-14):385-7.

PMID:9012194
Abstract

UNLABELLED

We compared an automated self setting CPAP-titration with conventional constant CPAP. In 12 patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome 2 polysomnographies were performed after introduction of CPAP-therapy. In a randomized cross-over study a constant CPAP during one night and in a second night a computerized variation of pressure was applied by a self-setting CPAP-device (Auto AdjustTM CPAP). During both methods apneas, hypopneas and snoring were reduced. Apnea index was reduced from 32.5 +/- 28.5 at diagnosis to 3.3 +/- 4.7 by Auto Adjust CPAP and to 4.0 +/- 5.3 by constant CPAP. The results of the 2 methods were not significantly different. Total sleep-time, sleep efficiency and sleep stages did not show any significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of pressure-intolerance automated self setting CPAP offers an alternative beneath BiPAP. The significance of this method with regard to BiPAP therapy must further be evaluated.

摘要

未标注

我们将自动自设定持续气道正压通气(CPAP)滴定法与传统的恒定CPAP进行了比较。在12例阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者中,引入CPAP治疗后进行了2次多导睡眠图检查。在一项随机交叉研究中,一个晚上使用恒定CPAP,另一个晚上通过自设定CPAP设备(Auto AdjustTM CPAP)应用计算机化压力变化。在两种方法中,呼吸暂停、呼吸浅慢和打鼾情况均有所减轻。呼吸暂停指数从诊断时的32.5±28.5通过自动调整CPAP降至3.3±4.7,通过恒定CPAP降至4.0±5.3。两种方法的结果无显著差异。总睡眠时间、睡眠效率和睡眠阶段均未显示出任何显著差异。

结论

在存在压力不耐受的情况下,自动自设定CPAP在双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)之外提供了一种替代方法。该方法相对于BiPAP治疗的意义必须进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验