Künzli N, Lurmann F, Segal M, Ngo L, Balmes J, Tager I B
Division of Public Health Biology and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Environ Res. 1997 Jan;72(1):8-23. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1996.3687.
Human health effects due to chronic exposure to ozone (O3) have not been established due to problems with exposure assignment and the use of measures of lung function which may not reflect the site of O3 toxicity in the lung. We investigated the feasibility of retrospective assessment of O3 exposure-relevant covariates and derived lifetime "effective exposure" to ozone. Mid- and end-expiratory flows (FEF25-75%, FEF75%) were regressed against effective exposure and ecological lifetime exposure. A convenience sample of 130 UC Berkeley freshmen, ages 17-21, participated twice in the same tests (residential history, questionnaire, pulmonary function), 5-7 days apart. Students had to be lifelong residents of Northern (SF) or Southern (LA) California. Monthly ambient O3 concentrations (OZ) were assigned based on the lifetime residential history. An "effective time" (T) spent in OZ environments was derived for each residence and age stratum (0-2, 3-5, 6-11, 12+) with the use of questions about "total time spent outdoors" and time spent in "moderate" and/or "heavy" activity. Effective exposure was calculated over the lifetime (OZ x T) of each subject. Ozone metrics used were 8-hr averages (10 AM-6 PM) and "hours above 60 ppb." FEF25-75% and FEF75% decreased with both effective exposure and ecologic assignment of O3 exposure. For a 20 ppb increase (interquartile range) in 8-hr O3, FEF75% decreased 334 ml/sec (95%Cl:11-657 ml/sec), which corresponds to 14% (1.0-28.3%) of the population mean FEF75%. The corresponding effect on FEF25-75% was -420 ml/sec (95%Cl: +46 to -886, P = 0.08) or 7.2% of the mean. Use of time-activity data to define exposure had no impact on estimates. Negative confounding factors were region (SF vs LA), gender, and ethnicity. Lifetime 8-hr average O3 concentrations ranged from 16 to 74 ppb with little overlap between regions. There was no evidence for different O3 effects across regions. Effects were independent of lifetime mean PM10, NO2, temperature, or humidity. Effects on FEV1 tended to be negative whereas those for FVC, although negative in some models, where inconsistent and small. The strong relationship of lifetime ambient O3 on mid- and end-expiratory flows of college freshmen and the lack of association with FEV1 and FVC are consistent with biologic models of chronic effects of O3 in the small airways. Since the present study was designed as a pilot study, these findings have to be confirmed in a larger sample that is representative of the target population.
由于暴露评估存在问题以及肺功能测量方法可能无法反映臭氧在肺部的毒性部位,长期暴露于臭氧(O₃)对人体健康的影响尚未确定。我们研究了回顾性评估与臭氧暴露相关的协变量并得出终生“有效暴露”于臭氧的可行性。将呼气中期和末期流量(FEF₂₅₋₇₅%,FEF₇₅%)与有效暴露和生态终生暴露进行回归分析。选取了130名年龄在17 - 21岁的加州大学伯克利分校新生作为便利样本,他们在相隔5 - 7天的时间里两次参与相同的测试(居住史、问卷调查、肺功能测试)。学生必须是加利福尼亚州北部(旧金山)或南部(洛杉矶)的终生居民。根据终生居住史确定每月的环境臭氧浓度(OZ)。利用关于“户外总时间”以及在“中度”和/或“重度”活动中花费的时间的问题,为每个居住地区和年龄层(0 - 2岁、3 - 5岁、6 - 11岁、12岁以上)得出在臭氧环境中花费的“有效时间”(T)。计算每个受试者终生的有效暴露(OZ×T)。使用的臭氧指标是8小时平均值(上午10点至下午6点)和“60 ppb以上的小时数”。FEF₂₅₋₇₅%和FEF₇₅%随着有效暴露以及臭氧暴露的生态分配而降低。对于8小时臭氧浓度每增加20 ppb(四分位间距),FEF₇₅%降低334毫升/秒(95%置信区间:11 - 657毫升/秒),这相当于人群平均FEF₇₅%的14%(1.0 - 28.3%)。对FEF₂₅₋₇₅%的相应影响为 - 420毫升/秒(95%置信区间:+46至 - 886,P = 0.08)或平均值的7.2%。使用时间 - 活动数据来定义暴露对估计值没有影响。负面混杂因素包括地区(旧金山与洛杉矶)、性别和种族。终生8小时平均臭氧浓度范围为16至74 ppb,不同地区之间几乎没有重叠。没有证据表明不同地区的臭氧影响存在差异。这些影响与终生平均PM₁₀、NO₂、温度或湿度无关。对FEV₁的影响往往是负面的,而对于FVC,尽管在某些模型中是负面的,但并不一致且较小。终生环境臭氧与大学新生呼气中期和末期流量之间的强关联以及与FEV₁和FVC缺乏关联,与臭氧在小气道中的慢性影响的生物学模型一致。由于本研究设计为一项试点研究,这些发现必须在代表目标人群的更大样本中得到证实。