Takizawa M, Sone S, Oguchi K, Maruyama Y, Watanabe T, Gomi K, Wako T, Okazaki Y, Momose M, Imai S, Maruyama A, Sakai F
Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine.
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1996 Dec;56(14):1061-5.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of commercially available CRT monitors used in a teleradiology system by determining the rate of detection of simulated lung nodules.
Three types of CRT monitors were tested in the observation study. They had matrix sizes of 1024 x 768(16 inches, color), 1024 x 768(20 inches, color) and 1600 x 1125(24 inches, black and white). Twenty chest radiographs were obtained by Fuji computed radiography(FCR) of an anthropomorphic chest phantom with ten simulated nodules on its surface. These FCR films were digitized by a film digitizer with 125 DPI(1024 x 1024 matrix sizes)and 12 bit gray scales, and the image data were transferred from Shinshu University Hospital to other hospitals where interpretation was carried out by the radiologists. Ten radiologists of three hospitals were asked to interpret independently both the original FCR films and the images shown on the CRT monitors and to indicate the presence or absence of simulated nodules on the images by using a five-category rating scale. Receiver operating characteristics(ROC)curves were generated, and the results of interpretation on the FCR films and CRT monitors were compared.
Performance of the all readers was slightly better with the CRT monitors than on the FCR films, although the differences were not statistically significant. There were no statistically significant differences in performance depending on the type of CRT monitor.
Performance of the CRT monitors was comparable to that of FCR radiography in terms of interpreting the simulated lung nodules.
通过测定模拟肺结节的检测率,评估远程放射学系统中使用的商用阴极射线管(CRT)显示器的诊断性能。
在观察性研究中测试了三种类型的CRT显示器。它们的矩阵尺寸分别为1024×768(16英寸,彩色)、1024×768(20英寸,彩色)和1600×1125(24英寸,黑白)。通过富士计算机X线摄影(FCR)获得了20张胸部X光片,这些片子来自一个人体胸部模型,其表面有10个模拟结节。这些FCR胶片通过具有125 DPI(1024×1024矩阵尺寸)和12位灰度的胶片数字化仪进行数字化,图像数据从信州大学医院传输到其他医院,由放射科医生进行解读。要求三家医院的十名放射科医生独立解读原始FCR胶片和CRT显示器上显示的图像,并使用五级评分量表指出图像上模拟结节的有无。生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并比较FCR胶片和CRT显示器的解读结果。
所有读者在CRT显示器上的表现略优于在FCR胶片上的表现,尽管差异无统计学意义。根据CRT显示器的类型,性能上没有统计学显著差异。
在解读模拟肺结节方面,CRT显示器的性能与FCR放射摄影相当。