Suppr超能文献

随机化在有疼痛结局的研究中很重要:急性术后疼痛经皮电刺激神经疗法的系统评价

Randomization is important in studies with pain outcomes: systematic review of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute postoperative pain.

作者信息

Carroll D, Tramèr M, McQuay H, Nye B, Moore A

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, Oxford Radcliffe Hospital, Headington.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1996 Dec;77(6):798-803. doi: 10.1093/bja/77.6.798.

Abstract

We set out to examine the evidence for the importance of randomization of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in acute postoperative pain. Controlled studies were sought; randomization and analgesic and adverse effect outcomes were summarized. Forty-six reports were identified by searching strategies. Seventeen reports with 786 patients could be regarded unequivocally as randomized controlled trials (RCT) in acute postoperative pain. No meta-analysis was possible. In 15 of 17 RCT, we judged there to be no benefit of TENS compared with placebo. Of the 29 excluded trials, 19 had pain outcomes but were not RCT; in 17 of these 19 TENS studies, the authors concluded that TENS had a positive analgesic effect. No adverse effects were reported. Non-randomized studies overestimated treatment effects.

摘要

我们着手研究经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)随机化在急性术后疼痛中重要性的证据。我们寻找对照研究;总结随机化以及镇痛和不良反应结果。通过检索策略确定了46份报告。17份报告涉及786例患者,可明确视为急性术后疼痛的随机对照试验(RCT)。无法进行荟萃分析。在17项RCT中的15项中,我们判定与安慰剂相比,TENS没有益处。在29项排除的试验中,19项有疼痛结果但不是RCT;在这19项TENS研究中的17项中,作者得出结论认为TENS有积极的镇痛作用。未报告有不良反应。非随机研究高估了治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验