Denardo S J, Talbot L, Hargrave V K, Selfridge A R, Ports T A, Yock P G
Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Feb;29(2):283-92. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00482-2.
We sought to determine the effect of inhomogeneous distribution of beam power produced by Doppler catheters on measurements of mean and peak velocity of coronary blood flow.
Measurements of mean velocity of coronary blood flow by Doppler catheters have significant systematic errors that have not been completely characterized. We hypothesized that one error is the inhomogeneous distribution of the ultrasonic beam power and that this inhomogeneity makes measurements of mean, but not peak, velocity inaccurate.
We constructed a scaled-up model of a Doppler catheter to allow for accurate measurement of the distribution of beam power by miniature hydrophones. This catheter was placed in a model of coronary blood flow in which the fluid velocity was accurately measured by an external laser Doppler velocimeter. The laser Doppler measurements of mean velocity were compared with the measurements of mean velocity made by the catheter, using fast Fourier transform analysis, both without and with correction for inhomogeneous beam power distribution. Peak velocity measurements were also compared, as predicted from theory, without the need of correction for inhomogeneous beam power distribution. To investigate the clinical relevance of our results, we conducted studies using a clinical Doppler catheter both in a scaled model of coronary flow and in a series of eight patients. In the model and in each patient, we rotated the catheter without changing the axial position to systematically alter the relation of the beam power distribution to the local fluid dynamics.
The measurement of beam power distribution revealed significant inhomogeneity. Comparison of the measured mean frequency shifts without correction for inhomogeneities in the distribution yielded a statistically significant difference. After correction for inhomogeneities, there was no statistically significant difference. Also, there was no significant difference for the peak frequency shifts. Rotation of the clinical catheter in the scaled model and in the patients changed the measured mean velocity (average change 18.8% and 20.6%, respectively), but not the measured peak velocity (average change 5.0% and 4.3%, respectively).
For signal analysis using a fast Fourier transform, the inhomogeneous distribution of power of the ultrasonic beam produced by Doppler catheters makes measurements of mean, but not peak, velocity inaccurate. Measurements of peak velocity may therefore prove superior to measurements of mean velocity in estimating the response to pharmacologic intervention and in estimating stenosis severity.
我们试图确定多普勒导管产生的束流功率不均匀分布对冠状动脉血流平均速度和峰值速度测量的影响。
用多普勒导管测量冠状动脉血流平均速度存在显著的系统误差,且尚未完全明确其特征。我们推测其中一个误差是超声束流功率的不均匀分布,并且这种不均匀性会使平均速度(而非峰值速度)的测量不准确。
我们构建了一个放大的多普勒导管模型,以便通过微型水听器精确测量束流功率分布。将该导管置于冠状动脉血流模型中,其中流体速度由外部激光多普勒测速仪精确测量。使用快速傅里叶变换分析,在不校正和校正束流功率分布不均匀的情况下,将激光多普勒测量的平均速度与导管测量的平均速度进行比较。如理论预测的那样,峰值速度测量也进行了比较,无需校正束流功率分布不均匀。为了研究我们结果的临床相关性,我们使用临床多普勒导管在冠状动脉血流的比例模型和一系列八名患者中进行了研究。在模型和每个患者中,我们在不改变轴向位置的情况下旋转导管,以系统地改变束流功率分布与局部流体动力学的关系。
束流功率分布测量显示出显著的不均匀性。未校正分布不均匀性时测量的平均频移比较产生了统计学上的显著差异。校正不均匀性后,没有统计学上的显著差异。此外,峰值频移也没有显著差异。临床导管在比例模型和患者中的旋转改变了测量的平均速度(分别平均变化18.8%和20.6%),但没有改变测量的峰值速度(分别平均变化5.0%和4.3%)。
对于使用快速傅里叶变换的信号分析,多普勒导管产生的超声束流功率不均匀分布会使平均速度(而非峰值速度)的测量不准确。因此,在评估药物干预反应和估计狭窄严重程度方面,峰值速度测量可能优于平均速度测量。