• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种失语症测试的重测信度:非脑损伤老年人的表现

Test-retest reliability of three aphasia tests: performance of non-brain-damaged older adults.

作者信息

Flanagan J L, Jackson S T

机构信息

Department of Hearing and Speech, School of Allied Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66160-7605, USA.

出版信息

J Commun Disord. 1997 Jan-Feb;30(1):33-42; quiz 42-3. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9924(96)00039-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0021-9924(96)00039-1
PMID:9017477
Abstract

This study was designed to assess the test-retest reliability of three aphasia tests. The Auditory Comprehension Test for Sentences (ACTS), the Boston Naming Test (BNT), and the Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia (RCBA) were administered on two separate occasions to 31 non-brain-damaged adults aged 50 to 76 years. The results showed acceptable score stability for all three aphasia tests. Sixty-eight percent of the time, older non-brain-damaged adults would be expected to score within 4.0% or less of the total number of test items on repeated testing.

摘要

本研究旨在评估三项失语症测试的重测信度。对31名年龄在50至76岁之间的非脑损伤成年人在两个不同时间分别进行句子听觉理解测试(ACTS)、波士顿命名测试(BNT)和失语症阅读理解成套测验(RCBA)。结果表明,所有三项失语症测试的分数稳定性均可接受。在重复测试时,68%的情况下,年龄较大的非脑损伤成年人预计得分在测试项目总数的4.0%以内或更低。

相似文献

1
Test-retest reliability of three aphasia tests: performance of non-brain-damaged older adults.三种失语症测试的重测信度:非脑损伤老年人的表现
J Commun Disord. 1997 Jan-Feb;30(1):33-42; quiz 42-3. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9924(96)00039-1.
2
Measurement of reading comprehension in aphasia with the RCBA.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1982 Aug;47(3):288-91. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4703.288.
3
Validity, reliability and sensitivity of the NORLA-6: Naming and oral reading for language in aphasia 6-point scale.NORLA-6的效度、信度和敏感度:失语症语言命名及口语阅读6分制量表
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Apr;20(2):274-283. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2016.1276962. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
4
Validity and reliability of a new test for Turkish-speaking aphasic patients: Ege Aphasia Test.土耳其语失语症患者新测试的有效性和可靠性:Ege 失语症测试。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32(1):157-63. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130833.
5
Montreal-Toulouse language assessment battery for aphasia: validity and reliability evidence.蒙特利尔 - 图卢兹失语症语言评估量表:效度与信度证据
NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(3):463-71. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141057.
6
Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Serbian Aphasia Screening Test.塞尔维亚失语症筛查测试的信度和效度评估。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304565. eCollection 2024.
7
Developing an Arabic Screening Test for Adult-Onset Chronic Aphasia.开发一种针对成人慢性失语症的阿拉伯语筛查测试。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2018;70(2):74-81. doi: 10.1159/000490105. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
8
Development of a short form of the Boston naming test for individuals with aphasia.失语症个体波士顿命名测验简短版的编制。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Aug;54(4):1089-100. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0119). Epub 2010 Dec 20.
9
Validity of multiple-sentence reading comprehension tests for aphasic adults.针对失语症成年人的多句阅读理解测试的有效性
J Speech Hear Disord. 1986 Feb;51(1):82-7. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5101.82.
10
Parallel Picture-Naming Tests: Development and Psychometric Properties for Farsi-Speaking Adults.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(2):100-107. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2015.1107562. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.失语症评估工具的质量:一项系统综述。
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):271. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030271.
2
Validation of the Norma Latina Neuropsychological Assessment Battery in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease in Mexico.拉丁美洲Norma 神经心理学评估电池在墨西哥阿尔茨海默病患者中的验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;19(18):11322. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811322.
3
4 modifies the relationship between infectious burden and poor cognition.4改变了感染负担与认知功能减退之间的关系。
Neurol Genet. 2020 Jul 7;6(4):e462. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000462. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Machine learning-based estimation of cognitive performance using regional brain MRI markers: the Northern Manhattan Study.基于机器学习的利用区域性脑 MRI 标志物评估认知表现:北方曼哈顿研究。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Jun;15(3):1270-1278. doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00325-3.
5
Cholinergic White Matter Lesions, AD-Signature Cortical Thickness, and Change in Cognition: The Northern Manhattan Study.胆碱能性白质病变、AD 特征性皮质厚度与认知变化:北方曼哈顿研究。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Jul 13;75(8):1508-1515. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz279.
6
Measures of Adiposity and Alzheimer's Disease-Related MRI Markers: The Northern Manhattan Study.肥胖指标与阿尔茨海默病相关 MRI 标志物:北方曼哈顿研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(4):995-1004. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190092.
7
Phonemic fluency improved after inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation in a case of chronic aphasia.在一例慢性失语症患者中,抑制性经颅磁刺激后音素流畅性得到改善。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2019 Mar;42(1):92-95. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000322.
8
Benchmarks of Significant Change After Aphasia Rehabilitation.失语症康复后的显著变化基准。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jun;100(6):1131-1139.e87. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.08.177. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
Treatment Response to a Double Administration of Constraint-Induced Language Therapy in Chronic Aphasia.慢性失语症双重约束诱导语言治疗的反应。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jul 13;61(7):1664-1690. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-16-0102.
10
Greater depressive symptoms, cognition, and markers of brain aging: Northern Manhattan Study.抑郁症状更严重、认知能力下降与大脑老化标志物:北方曼哈顿研究。
Neurology. 2018 Jun 5;90(23):e2077-e2085. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005639. Epub 2018 May 9.