• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手机通话与机动车碰撞之间的关联。

Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions.

作者信息

Redelmeier D A, Tibshirani R J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 13;336(7):453-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199702133360701.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM199702133360701
PMID:9017937
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because of a belief that the use of cellular telephones while driving may cause collisions, several countries have restricted their use in motor vehicles, and others are considering such regulations. We used an epidemiologic method, the case-crossover design, to study whether using a cellular telephone while driving increases the risk of a motor vehicle collision.

METHODS

We studied 699 drivers who had cellular telephones and who were involved in motor vehicle collisions resulting in substantial property damage but no personal injury. Each person's cellular-telephone calls on the day of the collision and during the previous week were analyzed through the use of detailed billing records.

RESULTS

A total of 26,798 cellular-telephone calls were made during the 14-month study period. The risk of a collision when using a cellular telephone was four times higher than the risk when a cellular telephone was not being used (relative risk, 4.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 3.0 to 6.5). The relative risk was similar for drivers who differed in personal characteristics such as age and driving experience; calls close to the time of the collision were particularly hazardous (relative risk, 4.8 for calls placed within 5 minutes of the accident, as compared with 1.3 for calls placed more than 15 minutes before the accident; P<0.001); and units that allowed the hands to be free (relative risk, 5.9) offered no safety advantage over hand-held units (relative risk, 3.9; P not significant). Thirty-nine percent of the drivers called emergency services after the collision, suggesting that having a cellular telephone may have had advantages in the aftermath of an event.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of cellular telephones in motor vehicles is associated with a quadrupling of the risk of a collision during the brief time interval involving a call. Decisions about regulation of such telephones, however, need to take into account the benefits of the technology and the role of individual responsibility.

摘要

背景

由于人们认为驾车时使用移动电话可能会引发碰撞事故,一些国家已对在机动车内使用移动电话加以限制,其他国家也在考虑制定此类法规。我们采用了一种流行病学方法——病例交叉设计,来研究驾车时使用移动电话是否会增加机动车碰撞风险。

方法

我们研究了699名拥有移动电话且遭遇机动车碰撞事故的司机,这些事故造成了重大财产损失但未导致人员伤亡。通过详细的计费记录,分析了每个人在碰撞当天及前一周的移动电话通话情况。

结果

在为期14个月的研究期间,共拨打了26798次移动电话。使用移动电话时发生碰撞的风险比不使用移动电话时高出四倍(相对风险为4.3;95%置信区间为3.0至6.5)。对于年龄和驾驶经验等个人特征不同的司机,相对风险相似;接近碰撞时间的通话尤其危险(事故发生前5分钟内拨打的电话相对风险为4.8,而事故发生前15分钟以上拨打的电话相对风险为1.3;P<0.001);免提装置(相对风险为5.9)与手持装置相比(相对风险为3.9;P无显著性差异)并无安全优势。39%的司机在碰撞后拨打了紧急服务电话,这表明拥有移动电话在事故发生后可能具有优势。

结论

在涉及通话的短时间内,在机动车内使用移动电话会使碰撞风险增加四倍。然而,关于此类电话的监管决策需要考虑该技术的益处以及个人责任的作用。

相似文献

1
Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions.手机通话与机动车碰撞之间的关联。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 13;336(7):453-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199702133360701.
2
Car phones and car crashes: an ecologic analysis.车载电话与车祸:一项生态学分析。
Can J Public Health. 1998 May-Jun;89(3):157-61. doi: 10.1007/BF03404465.
3
Cost-effectiveness of regulations against using a cellular telephone while driving.禁止开车时使用手机的法规的成本效益。
Med Decis Making. 1999 Jan-Mar;19(1):1-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900101.
4
Is there a link between motor vehicle collisions and being a cigarette smoker in Canada? Analysis of survey data from Ontario from 2002 to 2014.在加拿大,机动车碰撞事故与吸烟之间存在关联吗?对安大略省2002年至2014年调查数据的分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 May 19;19(4):364-370. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1419342. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
5
Impact of medical fitness to drive policies in preventing property damage, injury, and death from motor vehicle collisions in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省医疗驾驶适应性政策对预防机动车碰撞造成的财产损失、伤害和死亡的影响。
J Safety Res. 2020 Dec;75:251-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
6
Identifying motorist characteristics associated with youth bicycle-motor vehicle collisions.识别与青少年自行车-机动车碰撞相关的驾驶者特征。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(7):744-748. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1639680. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
7
Medications and risk of motor vehicle collision responsibility in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based case-control study.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的药物与机动车碰撞责任风险:一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Jun;6(6):e374-e385. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00027-X. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Serious motor vehicle collisions involving young drivers on Norwegian roads 2013-2016: Speeding and driver-related errors are the main challenge.2013-2016 年挪威道路上涉及年轻驾驶员的严重机动车碰撞:超速和驾驶员相关错误是主要挑战。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(6):382-388. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1770237. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
9
Traffic-law enforcement and risk of death from motor-vehicle crashes: case-crossover study.交通执法与机动车碰撞事故死亡风险:病例交叉研究
Lancet. 2003 Jun 28;361(9376):2177-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13770-1.
10
Acute cannabis consumption and motor vehicle collision risk: systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis.急性大麻使用与机动车碰撞风险:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2012 Feb 9;344:e536. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e536.

引用本文的文献

1
Antipsychotic treatment adherence and motor vehicle crash among drivers with schizophrenia: a case-crossover study.精神分裂症患者司机的抗精神病药物治疗依从性与机动车碰撞事故:一项病例交叉研究。
CMAJ. 2025 Jun 8;197(22):E612-E619. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.250020.
2
Validity of the Smombie Scale: Sensitivity and specificity in identifying pedestrian risk group.“低头族”量表的有效性:识别行人风险群体的敏感性和特异性。
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 7;10:20552076241271851. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271851. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Demographic characteristics and trends of cell phone use while driving citations in selected states in the United States, 2010-2020.
2010-2020 年美国部分州开车时使用手机罚单的人口统计学特征和趋势。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(6):788-794. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2351605. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
4
The case-crossover design for studying sudden events.用于研究突发事件的病例交叉设计。
BMJ Med. 2022 May 31;1(1):e000214. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000214. eCollection 2022.
5
Factors Influencing Pedestrian Smartphone Use and Effect of Combined Visual and Auditory Intervention on "Smombies": A Chinese Observational Study.影响行人使用智能手机的因素及视听联合干预对“低头族”的影响:一项中国观察性研究。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;67:1604601. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604601. eCollection 2022.
6
Clinical Decision Support Stewardship: Best Practices and Techniques to Monitor and Improve Interruptive Alerts.临床决策支持管理:监测和改进干扰性警报的最佳实践和技术。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 May;13(3):560-568. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748856. Epub 2022 May 25.
7
Risk of Accidents or Chronic Disorders From Improper Use of Mobile Phones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.不当使用手机导致事故或慢性疾病的风险:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 20;24(1):e21313. doi: 10.2196/21313.
8
The effect of cellphone position on driving and gaze behaviour.手机位置对驾驶和注视行为的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 8;11(1):7692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87120-2.
9
Effects of a dual task and different levels of divided attention on motor-related cortical potential.双重任务和不同程度的注意力分散对运动相关皮层电位的影响。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2020 Nov;32(11):710-716. doi: 10.1589/jpts.32.710. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
10
Cellphone laws and teens' calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019.手机法律与青少年驾车时打电话:对2013年、2015年、2017年和2019年重复横断面调查的分析
Inj Epidemiol. 2020 Dec 3;7(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-00290-x.