Weiss L H, Schwarz J C
University of Connecticut, USA.
Child Dev. 1996 Oct;67(5):2101-14.
The purpose of the present study was to examine Baumrind's T3 conceptual framework using a multiple informant design and an older adolescent population. With 178 college students and their families as participants, the present study found many of the predicted relations between parents' child-rearing style (Authoritative, Democratic, Nondirective, Nonauthoritarian-Directive, Authoritarian-Directive, and Unengaged) and their adolescent children's behavior in the 4 domains assessed: personality, adjustment, academic achievement, and substance use. The differences between parenting types on the criterion measures were not as large as reported in Baumrind's study, and significant effects were predominantly due to the poor scores from children with Unengaged and Authoritarian-Directive parents. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the Authoritative parenting type, the utility of using a typology, and areas for future research.
本研究的目的是采用多 informant 设计和年龄较大的青少年群体来检验鲍姆林德的 T3 概念框架。以 178 名大学生及其家庭为参与者,本研究发现了父母教养方式(权威型、民主型、非指导性、非权威 - 指导型、权威 - 指导型和不参与型)与他们青少年子女在评估的四个领域(人格、适应、学业成绩和物质使用)中的行为之间的许多预测关系。在标准测量上教养类型之间的差异不像鲍姆林德研究中报告的那么大,显著影响主要归因于来自不参与型和权威 - 指导型父母的孩子得分较低。将根据这些结果对权威型教养方式的影响、使用类型学的效用以及未来研究领域进行讨论。