Kemper H C, Verschuur R
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1977 Jun 15;37(1):71-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00421600.
In 12--18 year old boys actual steprate on a treadmill was compared to the scores of two types of mechanical pedometers (Russian and German), attached to the waist. Both types show deviations from actual steprate in running at speeds of 8 and 10 km - h-1 of ca. 5% (+/- 9%). In walking or running at 6 km - h-1 and in running at 14 km - h-1 both types give an overestimation of ca. 8.5% (+/- 8%). In walking at a speed of 2 and 4 km - h-1 the scores are not reliable because of the big standard deviation of ca. 34%. Oxygen uptake (ml - kg-1) and heart rate (beats - min-1) increase more in running than in walking, actual steprate (steps - min-1) however increases less in running compared to walking. If pedometers register only during running they reflect actual steprate fairly good and give a good estimation of the change in oxygen uptake as speed gathers.
在12至18岁的男孩中,将跑步机上的实际步频与两种系在腰部的机械式计步器(俄罗斯和德国产)的读数进行了比较。两种计步器在速度为8和10千米/小时跑步时,与实际步频的偏差约为5%(±9%)。在速度为6千米/小时行走或跑步以及速度为14千米/小时跑步时,两种计步器的读数都高估了约8.5%(±8%)。在速度为2和4千米/小时行走时,读数不可靠,因为标准差约为34%,数值较大。摄氧量(毫升/千克)和心率(次/分钟)在跑步时比行走时增加得更多,然而实际步频(步/分钟)在跑步时与行走时相比增加得更少。如果计步器仅在跑步时记录,它们能较好地反映实际步频,并能很好地估计随着速度增加摄氧量的变化。