Goodacre R, Kell D B
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed, UK.
Anal Chem. 1996 Jan 15;68(2):271-80. doi: 10.1021/ac950671t.
For pyrolysis mass spectrometry (PyMS) to be used for the routine identification of microorganisms, for quantifying determinands in biological and biotechnological systems, and in the production of useful mass spectral libraries, it is paramount that newly acquired spectra be compared to those previously collected. Neural network and other multivariate calibration models have been used to relate mass spectra to the biological features of interest. As commonly observed, however, mass spectral fingerprints showed a lack of long-term reproducibility, due to instrumental drift in the mass spectrometer; when identical materials were analyzed by PyMS at dates from 4 to 20 months apart, neural network models produced at earlier times could not be used to give accurate estimates of determinand concentrations or bacterial identities. Neural networks, however, can be used to correct for pyrolysis mass spectrometer instrumental drift itself, so that neural network or other multivariate calibration models created using previously collected data can be used to give accurate estimates of determinand concentration or the nature of bacteria (or, indeed, other materials) from newly acquired pyrolysis mass spectra. This approach is not limited solely to pyrolysis mass spectrometry but is generally applicable to any analytical tool which is prone to instrumental drift, such as IR, ESR, NMR and other spectroscopies, and gas and liquid chromatography, as well as other types of mass spectrometry.
为了将热解质谱法(PyMS)用于微生物的常规鉴定、生物和生物技术系统中分析物的定量以及有用质谱库的建立,将新获得的光谱与之前收集的光谱进行比较至关重要。神经网络和其他多元校准模型已被用于将质谱与感兴趣的生物学特征相关联。然而,正如常见的那样,由于质谱仪的仪器漂移,质谱指纹显示缺乏长期重现性;当在相隔4至20个月的不同日期对相同材料进行PyMS分析时,早期建立的神经网络模型无法用于准确估计分析物浓度或细菌种类。然而,神经网络可用于校正热解质谱仪本身的仪器漂移,这样,使用先前收集的数据创建的神经网络或其他多元校准模型就可用于根据新获得的热解质谱准确估计分析物浓度或细菌(或其他材料)的性质。这种方法不仅限于热解质谱法,通常适用于任何容易出现仪器漂移的分析工具,如红外光谱、电子自旋共振光谱、核磁共振光谱和其他光谱学方法,以及气相色谱和液相色谱,还有其他类型的质谱分析。