• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Dirithromycin versus amoxiclav in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

作者信息

Van Royen P, Betz W, Heyrman J, Taziaux P, Van den Haute M, Poelman M

机构信息

University of Antwerp, Centre for General Medicine, Belgium.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1997 Jan-Feb;25(1):33-40. doi: 10.1177/030006059702500105.

DOI:10.1177/030006059702500105
PMID:9027671
Abstract

A total of 334 patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were treated with either dirithromycin for 5 days (n = 169) or amoxiclav for 7-10 days (n = 165) in an open randomized trial. The efficacy and tolerability of the two drugs were compared. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between the two treatment arms. Clinical success (cure or improvement) was obtained in 94.5% and 93.1% of patients treated with dirithromycin and amoxiclav, respectively. Adverse events (mostly gastrointestinal) occurred in both groups, but led to discontinuation of treatment (in only seven patients). We conclude that the two drugs are equally efficacious and safe.

摘要

相似文献

1
Dirithromycin versus amoxiclav in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
J Int Med Res. 1997 Jan-Feb;25(1):33-40. doi: 10.1177/030006059702500105.
2
Comparative evaluation of the clinical and microbiological efficacy of co-amoxiclav vs cefixime or ciprofloxacin in bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.阿莫西林克拉维酸与头孢克肟或环丙沙星治疗慢性支气管炎细菌感染急性加重的临床及微生物学疗效比较评估
J Chemother. 1995 Oct;7(5):432-41. doi: 10.1179/joc.1995.7.5.432.
3
Comparison of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of acute tracheobronchitis and acute infectious exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in adults. Azithromycin Study Group.
J Int Med Res. 1996 Sep-Oct;24(5):407-18. doi: 10.1177/030006059602400502.
4
A multicentre study comparing the safety and efficacy of dirithromycin with erythromycin in the treatment of bronchitis.一项比较地红霉素与红霉素治疗支气管炎安全性和有效性的多中心研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:139-51. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.139.
5
Comparative study of dirithromycin and azithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素与阿奇霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的对比研究
J Chemother. 1999 Apr;11(2):119-25. doi: 10.1179/joc.1999.11.2.119.
6
Five-day dirithromycin therapy is as effective as seven-day erythromycin therapy for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.对于慢性支气管炎急性加重期,五日地红霉素疗法与七日红霉素疗法疗效相当。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Apr;43(4):541-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.4.541.
7
Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的临床疗效
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:131-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.131.
8
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.氯碳头孢(LY163892)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的比较
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):214-29.
9
Clinical efficacy of dirithromycin versus miocamycin in the treatment of acute bronchitis or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.地红霉素与米卡霉素治疗急性支气管炎或慢性支气管炎急性加重的临床疗效
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31 Suppl C:153-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_c.153.
10
Efficacy and tolerance of cefpodoxime proxetil compared with co-amoxiclav in the treatment of exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.头孢泊肟酯与阿莫西林克拉维酸钾治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的疗效及耐受性比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Dec;26 Suppl E:63-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_e.63.

引用本文的文献

1
Network meta-analysis of success rate and safety in antibiotic treatments of bronchitis.支气管炎抗生素治疗成功率和安全性的网状Meta分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Aug 9;12:2391-2405. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S139521. eCollection 2017.
2
Short-course antimicrobial therapy of respiratory tract infections.呼吸道感染的短程抗菌治疗。
Drugs. 2003;63(20):2169-84. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363200-00002.
3
Review of macrolides and ketolides: focus on respiratory tract infections.大环内酯类和酮内酯类药物综述:聚焦呼吸道感染
Drugs. 2001;61(4):443-98. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161040-00003.