Ugolini D, Bogliolo A, Parodi S, Casilli C, Santi L
Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, National Institute for Research on Cancer, Genoa, Italy.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997 Jan;85(1):33-8.
An evaluation method used to assess the quality of research productivity and to provide priorities for budget allocation purposes is presented. This method, developed by a working group of the National Institute for Research on Cancer (IST), Genoa, Italy, is based on the partitioning of categories of the Science Citation Index and Journal Citation Reports (SCI-JCR) into deciles, which normalizes journal impact factors in order to gauge the quality of the productivity. A second parameter related to the number of staff of each institute department co-authoring a given paper has been introduced in order to guide departmental budget allocations. The information scientists of the IST Documentation Center who participated in the working group played a pivotal role in developing the computerized database of publications, providing and analyzing data, supplying and evaluating literature on the topic, and placing international bibliographic databases at the working group's disposal.
本文介绍了一种用于评估研究产出质量并为预算分配提供优先级的评估方法。该方法由意大利热那亚国家癌症研究所（IST）的一个工作组开发，基于将科学引文索引和期刊引证报告（SCI-JCR）的类别划分为十分位数，从而对期刊影响因子进行归一化处理，以衡量产出质量。为了指导部门预算分配，还引入了与共同撰写给定论文的各研究所部门工作人员数量相关的第二个参数。参与该工作组的IST文献中心的信息科学家在开发出版物计算机数据库、提供和分析数据、提供和评估该主题的文献以及让工作组使用国际书目数据库方面发挥了关键作用。
