Gnaegi A, Feihl F, Perret C
Institute of Clinical Physiopathology, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland.
Crit Care Med. 1997 Feb;25(2):213-20. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199702000-00003.
To evaluate French, Swiss, and Belgian intensive care physicians' knowledge about the pulmonary artery catheter.
Survey study by questionnaire.
Eighty-six European university and nonuniversity intensive care units (ICUs).
One hundred thirty-four ICUs identified from the directories of two European intensive care medicine societies were asked to participate. Five hundred thirty-five critical care physicians working in 86 ICUs participated.
In any particular ICU, all physicians were to complete--simultaneously, anonymously and without prior notice--a multiple choice questionnaire consisting of 31 questions regarding all aspects of bedside pulmonary artery catheterization. This questionnaire was the same one already used and extensively validated in a similar study conducted several years earlier in the United States and Canada.
The percentage of correct answers per participant (score) was tabulated. Sixty-eight percent of respondents still in training (n = 232) believed that their knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter was less than adequate; 36% of those who had completed their postgraduate training (n = 294) also believed their knowledge to be inadequate. The mean score of all respondents was 72.2 +/- 14.4%, significantly lower (p <.0001) in case of uncompleted postgraduate training (67.3 +/- 14.7%, lower quartile 56.7%, median 70.0%, upper quartile 76.7%), as compared with completed postgraduate training (76.1 +/- 13.0%, lower quartile 70.0%, median 80.0%, upper quartile 86.7%). When using multivariate analysis, the location of the ICU in a university hospital, the belief of respondent that his/her knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter was adequate, and the responsibility for supervising catheter insertion were the only independent predictors of good performance on the questionnaire (p < .001 for all three variables). It was impossible to identify any subcategory of physicians with a uniformly good knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter. The proportion of incorrect answers to some basic items was disturbingly high. For instance, approximately 50% of the respondents, whether trained or in training, did not correctly identify pulmonary artery occlusion pressure from a clear chart recording.
Knowledge of right-heart pulmonary artery catheterization is not uniformly good among ICU physicians. Accreditation policies and teaching practices concerning this technique need urgent revision.
评估法国、瑞士和比利时重症监护医师对肺动脉导管的了解程度。
问卷调查研究。
86个欧洲大学及非大学重症监护病房(ICU)。
从两个欧洲重症监护医学学会名录中确定的134个ICU被邀请参与研究。86个ICU的535名重症监护医师参与了研究。
在任何特定的ICU中,所有医师需同时、匿名且无事先通知地完成一份包含31个关于床边肺动脉导管插入术各方面问题的多项选择题问卷。该问卷与几年前在美国和加拿大进行的一项类似研究中使用并经过广泛验证的问卷相同。
统计每位参与者的正确答案百分比(得分)。仍在接受培训的68%的受访者(n = 232)认为他们对肺动脉导管的了解不足;完成研究生培训的受访者中有36%(n = 294)也认为自己的知识不足。所有受访者的平均得分为72.2±14.4%,未完成研究生培训者(67.3±14.7%,下四分位数56.7%,中位数70.0%,上四分位数76.7%)的得分显著低于(p <.0001)完成研究生培训者(76.1±13.0%,下四分位数70.0%,中位数80.0%,上四分位数86.7%)。在进行多变量分析时,大学医院中ICU的位置、受访者认为自己对肺动脉导管的了解足够以及负责监督导管插入是问卷表现良好的仅有的独立预测因素(所有三个变量的p <.001)。无法确定任何一类对肺动脉导管有一致良好了解的医师亚组。一些基本项目的错误答案比例高得令人不安。例如,约50%的受访者,无论是否接受过培训,都未能从清晰的图表记录中正确识别肺动脉闭塞压。
ICU医师对右心肺动脉导管插入术的了解程度并不一致。关于该技术的认证政策和教学实践需要紧急修订。