Suppr超能文献

在感染性休克复苏期间进行连续心输出量评估还是系列超声心动图检查?

Continuous cardiac output assessment or serial echocardiography during septic shock resuscitation?

作者信息

Vignon Philippe

机构信息

Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Dupuytren Teaching hospital, Limoges, France.

Inserm CIC 1435, Dupuytren Teaching hospital, Limoges, France.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(12):797. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.04.11.

Abstract

Septic shock is the leading cause of cardiovascular failure in the intensive care unit (ICU). Cardiac output is a primary component of global oxygen delivery to organs and a sensitive parameter of cardiovascular failure. Any mismatch between oxygen delivery and rapidly varying metabolic demand may result in tissue dysoxia, hence organ dysfunction. Since the intricate alterations of both vascular and cardiac function may rapidly and widely change over time, cardiac output should be measured repeatedly to characterize the type of shock, select the appropriate therapeutic intervention, and evaluate patient's response to therapy. Among the numerous techniques commercially available for measuring cardiac output, transpulmonary thermodilution (TPT) provides a continuous monitoring with external calibration capability, whereas critical care echocardiography (CCE) offers serial hemodynamic assessments. CCE allows early identification of potential sources of inaccuracy of TPT, including right ventricular failure, severe tricuspid or left-sided regurgitations, intracardiac shunt, very low flow states, or dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. In addition, CCE has the unique advantage of depicting the distinct components generating left ventricular stroke volume (large cavity size preserved contractility), providing information on left ventricular diastolic properties and filling pressures, and assessing pulmonary artery pressure. Since inotropes may have deleterious effects if misused, their initiation should be based on the documentation of a cardiac dysfunction at the origin of the low flow state by CCE. Experts widely advocate using CCE as a first-line modality to initially evaluate the hemodynamic profile associated with shock, as opposed to more invasive techniques. Repeated assessments of both the efficacy (amplitude of the positive response) and tolerance (absence of side-effect) of therapeutic interventions are required to best guide patient management. Overall, TPT allowing continuous tracking of cardiac output variations and CCE appear complementary rather than mutually exclusive in patients with septic shock who require advanced hemodynamic monitoring.

摘要

感染性休克是重症监护病房(ICU)中心血管衰竭的主要原因。心输出量是全身器官氧输送的主要组成部分,也是心血管衰竭的一个敏感参数。氧输送与快速变化的代谢需求之间的任何不匹配都可能导致组织缺氧,进而导致器官功能障碍。由于血管和心脏功能的复杂改变可能会随时间迅速而广泛地变化,因此应反复测量心输出量,以确定休克类型、选择合适的治疗干预措施并评估患者对治疗的反应。在众多可用于测量心输出量的商业技术中,经肺热稀释法(TPT)可进行外部校准的连续监测,而重症监护超声心动图(CCE)则可提供系列血流动力学评估。CCE能够早期识别TPT潜在的不准确来源,包括右心室衰竭、严重三尖瓣或左侧反流、心内分流、极低流量状态或动态左心室流出道梗阻。此外,CCE具有独特的优势,可描绘产生左心室每搏输出量的不同组成部分(大腔室大小且保留收缩力),提供有关左心室舒张特性和充盈压的信息,并评估肺动脉压。由于如果滥用血管活性药物可能会产生有害影响,因此其使用应基于CCE记录的低流量状态起源的心脏功能障碍。专家广泛主张使用CCE作为一线检查手段,初步评估与休克相关的血流动力学特征,而不是采用更具侵入性的技术。为了更好地指导患者管理,需要对治疗干预措施的疗效(阳性反应幅度)和耐受性(无副作用)进行反复评估。总体而言,对于需要进行高级血流动力学监测的感染性休克患者,TPT能够连续跟踪心输出量变化,而CCE与之似乎是互补而非相互排斥的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ece/7333154/11cc0a96e291/atm-08-12-797-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验