Velarde C A, Short B L, Rivera O, Seale W, Howard R, Kolobow T
Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010-2970, USA.
Crit Care Med. 1997 Feb;25(2):276-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199702000-00014.
To compare dynamic pulmonary function studies using the ultrathin walled Kolobow endotracheal tube, with conventional endotracheal tubes of similar external diameter on rabbits during mechanical ventilation. To test the hypothesis that the increased internal diameter of the Kolobow tube will result in decreased airway resistance and work of breathing.
Controlled animal study.
Institutional animal research facility.
Adult female Dutch Belted rabbits (n = 6), weighing 1.4 to 1.6 kg.
The animals were initially intubated with a conventional endotracheal tube (2.5-mm internal diameter; 3.6-mm outer diameter); they were paralyzed and placed on a mechanical ventilator. Ventilatory settings were adjusted to obtain standard arterial blood gases: pH of 7.35 to 7.45; PaCO2 of 35 to 40 torr (4.7 to 5.3 kPa), and PaO2 of 90 to 100 torr (12.0 to 13.3 kPa). After the stabilization period, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were measured (period 1), the conventional endotracheal tube was replaced with a Kolobow tube, and PFTs were measured again and recorded (period 2). While continuously monitoring tidal volume, the peak inspiratory pressure was decreased to match the tidal volume measured during ventilation with the conventional endotracheal tube. Once the desired tidal volume was reached, PFTs were recorded (period 3). Flows were unchanged during the experiment and the length of the endotracheal tubes was the same for both the conventional and the Kolobow tube.
Mean values of the airway resistance and work of breathing from periods 1 and 3 were compared using the Student's t-test. There was a 59% decrease in total airway resistance (p = .001) and 45% decrease in the work of breathing (p = .0006).
The use of the ultrathin walled Kolobow endotracheal tube resulted in significant decreases in airway resistance and work of breathing, which has the potential for improving the ventilatory mechanics in very small premature newborns.
在机械通气期间,比较使用超薄壁科洛博(Kolobow)气管导管与外径相似的传统气管导管对兔进行动态肺功能研究的情况。检验科洛博导管内径增加会导致气道阻力和呼吸功降低这一假设。
对照动物研究。
机构动物研究设施。
成年雌性荷兰带兔(n = 6),体重1.4至1.6千克。
动物最初用传统气管导管(内径2.5毫米;外径3.6毫米)插管;使其麻痹并置于机械通气机上。调整通气设置以获得标准动脉血气:pH值7.35至7.45;动脉血二氧化碳分压35至40托(4.7至5.3千帕),动脉血氧分压90至100托(12.0至13.3千帕)。在稳定期后,测量肺功能测试(PFTs)(第1期),将传统气管导管换成科洛博导管,再次测量并记录PFTs(第2期)。在持续监测潮气量的同时,降低吸气峰压以使其与使用传统气管导管通气时测得的潮气量相匹配。一旦达到所需潮气量,记录PFTs(第3期)。实验期间流量不变,传统气管导管和科洛博导管的气管导管长度相同。
使用学生t检验比较第1期和第3期气道阻力和呼吸功的平均值。总气道阻力降低了59%(p = .001),呼吸功降低了45%(p = .0006)。
使用超薄壁科洛博气管导管可显著降低气道阻力和呼吸功,这有可能改善极小的早产新生儿的通气力学。