• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤患者结局研究中的系统偏差。

Systematic bias in outcome studies of persons with traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Corrigan J D, Bogner J A, Mysiw W J, Clinchot D, Fugate L

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ohio State University, Columous, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Feb;78(2):132-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90253-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90253-7
PMID:9041892
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

(1) Examine systematic biases created by subjects lost at 1-year follow-up in samples of persons with traumatic brain injury; (2) identify potential threats to generalization of outcomes data.

DESIGN

A consecutive sample of admissions to acute rehabilitation studied 1 year following discharge.

SETTING

An inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit in a large, academic medical center.

SUBJECTS

Eighty-eight patients with primary diagnosis of traumatic brain injury.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Subjects were considered lost to follow-up when phone calls, mail, clinic visits, and assistance from family failed to allow contact 1 year after discharge from acute rehabilitation. Potential effects of the biased follow-up sample were examined for seven suboptimal outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 38.6% of subjects were lost to follow-up. Subjects intoxicated at time of injury and those with history of substance abuse were more-likely to be lost. Among subjects followed, the likelihood of working or being in school 1 year after discharge was significantly less for those intoxicated at time of injury and those with a history of substance abuse.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic bias in longitudinal studies may result from subjects with substance use problems being lost to follow-up. Population estimates for return to work or school will be overestimated if those lost who have substance use problems resemble those followed.

摘要

目的

(1)研究创伤性脑损伤患者样本中在1年随访时失访的受试者所产生的系统偏差;(2)确定结果数据推广的潜在威胁。

设计

对急性康复出院后1年进行研究的连续入院样本。

地点

一家大型学术医疗中心的住院脑损伤康复科。

受试者

88例原发性创伤性脑损伤患者。

主要观察指标

当通过电话、邮件、门诊就诊以及家人协助仍无法在急性康复出院1年后取得联系时,受试者被视为失访。针对七个次优结果检查了有偏差的随访样本的潜在影响。

结果

共有38.6%的受试者失访。受伤时醉酒的受试者以及有药物滥用史的受试者更有可能失访。在接受随访的受试者中,受伤时醉酒的受试者以及有药物滥用史的受试者在出院1年后工作或上学的可能性显著较低。

结论

纵向研究中的系统偏差可能源于有物质使用问题的受试者失访。如果有物质使用问题的失访者与接受随访者相似,那么对重返工作或学校的人群估计将会被高估。

相似文献

1
Systematic bias in outcome studies of persons with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者结局研究中的系统偏差。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Feb;78(2):132-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90253-7.
2
A comparison of substance abuse and violence in the prediction of long-term rehabilitation outcomes after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后长期康复结局预测中物质滥用与暴力行为的比较
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 May;82(5):571-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.22340.
3
Systematic bias in traumatic brain injury outcome studies because of loss to follow-up.创伤性脑损伤结局研究中因失访导致的系统偏差。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Feb;84(2):153-60. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50093.
4
Characteristics and functional outcomes of brain injury caused by physical assault in Canada: a population-based study from an inpatient rehabilitation setting.加拿大躯体攻击所致脑损伤的特征和功能结局:基于住院康复环境的一项基于人群的研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(26):2213-20. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.774063. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
5
The association of early computed tomography scan findings and ambulation, self-care, and supervision needs at rehabilitation discharge and at 1 year after traumatic brain injury.早期计算机断层扫描结果与创伤性脑损伤后康复出院时及1年后的步行、自我护理和监督需求之间的关联。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Feb;84(2):214-20. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50094.
6
Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1-4 year follow-up.脑损伤后长时间意识障碍的恢复自然史:1-4 年随访后住院康复患者的结局。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:73-88. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17707-5.
7
Predictors of follow-up completeness in longitudinal research on traumatic brain injury: findings from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research traumatic brain injury model systems program.创伤性脑损伤纵向研究中随访完整性的预测因素:来自国家残疾研究所和康复研究创伤性脑损伤模型系统项目的研究结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Apr;95(4):633-41. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
8
The effect of a scheduled telephone intervention on outcome after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial.定期电话干预对中重度创伤性脑损伤后结局的影响:一项随机试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 May;86(5):851-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.015.
9
The magnitude and correlates of alcohol and drug use before traumatic brain injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Dec;83(12):1765-73. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.36085.
10
Post-injury substance abuse among persons with brain injury and persons with spinal cord injury.脑损伤患者和脊髓损伤患者伤后的药物滥用情况。
Brain Inj. 2002 Jul;16(7):583-92. doi: 10.1080/02699050110119475.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Clinical Outcomes 7-10 Years after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Exploring the Prognostic Utility of the IMPACT Lab Model and Cerebrospinal Fluid UCH-L1 and MAP-2.预测严重创伤性脑损伤后 7-10 年的临床结局:探索 IMPACT Lab 模型和脑脊液 UCH-L1 和 MAP-2 的预后价值。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):172-183. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01461-y. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
2
The Association Between Community Participation and Social Internet Use Among Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury.社区参与与创伤性脑损伤成年人社会互联网使用之间的关系。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):254-261. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000566.
3
Alcohol Use Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury.
酒精使用障碍与创伤性脑损伤
Alcohol Res. 2018;39(2):171-180.
4
Traumatic Brain Injuries during Development: Implications for Alcohol Abuse.发育过程中的创伤性脑损伤:对酒精滥用的影响。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jul 20;11:135. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00135. eCollection 2017.
5
Evaluating non-responders of a survey in the Swedish fracture register: no indication of different functional result.评估瑞典骨折登记处调查中的无应答者:未显示出功能结果存在差异。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 28;18(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1634-x.
6
Patterns of Alcohol Use after Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后的酒精使用模式。
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Jul 15;33(14):1390-6. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4071. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
Traumatic Brain Injury Patient, Injury, Therapy, and Ancillary Treatments Associated With Outcomes at Discharge and 9 Months Postdischarge.创伤性脑损伤患者、损伤情况、治疗方法以及与出院时和出院后9个月结局相关的辅助治疗
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8 Suppl):S304-29. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.030.
8
Rates of major depressive disorder and clinical outcomes following traumatic brain injury.颅脑损伤后重度抑郁障碍的发生率及临床结局。
JAMA. 2010 May 19;303(19):1938-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.599.
9
One-year and cumulative retention as predictors of success in methadone maintenance treatment: a comparison of two clinics in the United States and Israel.美沙酮维持治疗成功的预测因素之一:一年及累积留存率——美国和以色列两家诊所的比较
J Addict Dis. 2008;27(4):11-25. doi: 10.1080/10550880802324382.
10
Impact of age on long-term recovery from traumatic brain injury.年龄对创伤性脑损伤长期恢复的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 May;89(5):896-903. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.030.