Chiou W L
Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, College of Pharmacy (M/C 865), University of Illinois at Chicago 60612, USA.
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1996 Aug;24(4):433-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02353521.
Permeability coefficient (P) expressed as distance per unit time has been commonly interpreted to represent the velocity of drug movement across a heterogeneous medium such as skin and intestinal epithelium. The basis of such an interpretation is questioned on several grounds. For example, the basic assumption for calculating P (as defined conventionally) according to the Fick's law of diffusion requires the entire medium to be homogeneous and rate-limiting in transport. The theoretical basis of the widely used total resistance or resistance additivity concept is reviewed. Such a concept is shown to be applicable to the study of total transit time across the medium but may not be applicable to the study of steady-state flux or absorption across the medium under normal conditions. Based on the diffusional, compartmental, absorptive clearance or carrier-mediated-transport analysis it is shown that only the first transport resistance from the bulk medium across the surface (such as cellular membranes) of the permeation medium (such as a cell or a tissue) is usually the deciding factor in drug transport or absorption. Resistances on the other side of the surface barrier usually only affect the drug accumulation vs. time profile in the medium, but not the steady-state flux or absorption. The role of unstirred water layer adjacent to the internal capillary wall is postulated to play an important role in causing the blood-flow dependency in absorption, a phenomenon that cannot be rationalized by the conventional effective permeability concept. The conventional concept of sink conditions on the serosal side is questioned. The present analysis further supports the use of the absorptive or transport clearance concept in absorption or transport study. Effective permeability is regarded as a mathematical operator for transport across a barrier or a tissue, and may be unrelated to the Fick's law of diffusion under most conditions. The velocity unit for P is regarded simply as a "collapsed" unit based on the absorptive or transport clearance per unit gross surface area. It is hoped that this commentary will stimulate further research and discussions in this general area of drug transport and absorption. It appears that there is a need to experimentally confirm the total resistance theory in biological systems.
渗透系数(P)表示为单位时间内的距离,通常被解释为代表药物穿过诸如皮肤和肠上皮等异质介质的移动速度。这种解释的依据受到了多方面的质疑。例如,根据菲克扩散定律计算P(按传统定义)的基本假设要求整个介质在运输过程中是均匀且限速的。本文回顾了广泛使用的总阻力或阻力叠加概念的理论基础。结果表明,这样的概念适用于研究穿过介质的总转运时间,但在正常条件下可能不适用于研究穿过介质的稳态通量或吸收。基于扩散、隔室、吸收清除或载体介导转运分析表明,通常只有从主体介质穿过渗透介质(如细胞或组织)表面(如细胞膜)的第一道转运阻力才是药物转运或吸收的决定性因素。表面屏障另一侧的阻力通常只影响介质中药物积累与时间的关系曲线,而不影响稳态通量或吸收。假定与内部毛细血管壁相邻的未搅拌水层在导致吸收的血流依赖性方面起重要作用,这一现象无法用传统的有效渗透率概念来解释。对浆膜侧漏槽条件的传统概念提出了质疑。目前的分析进一步支持在吸收或转运研究中使用吸收或转运清除概念。有效渗透率被视为穿过屏障或组织的一种数学运算,在大多数情况下可能与菲克扩散定律无关。P的速度单位仅被视为基于单位总表面积的吸收或转运清除的“简化”单位。希望这篇评论能激发在药物转运和吸收这一总体领域的进一步研究和讨论。似乎有必要通过实验来证实生物系统中的总阻力理论。