• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种尿沉渣分析方法的比较

Comparison of three methods for analysis of urinary sediments.

作者信息

Yasui Y, Tatsumi N, Koezuka T, Okamura M, Yamagami S

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka City General Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Osaka City Med J. 1996 Dec;42(2):77-92.

PMID:9046847
Abstract

Efficiency of urine sediment analysis was evaluated in 423 specimens including 86 documented renal disorder ones using three methods; a traditional centrifugal and microscopic one, an image-scanning one and a flow cytometric one. Among the three methods, good correlations were observed in white blood cells and epithelial cells. Between white blood cells and bacterial counts a good correlation was observed only in the flow cytometry one. Female specimens usually demonstrated high values in white blood cells except with the microscopic method. Casts in patients with renal disorder exhibited significantly high in the flow cytometric method. In all methods, proteinuria specimens showed high cast count in the sediment. From these results we concluded that the flow cytometric method was clinically useful, especially in urinary tract disorder specimens.

摘要

采用三种方法对423份标本(包括86份已确诊的肾脏疾病标本)的尿沉渣分析效率进行了评估;一种传统的离心镜检法、一种图像扫描法和一种流式细胞术法。在这三种方法中,白细胞和上皮细胞之间观察到良好的相关性。白细胞和细菌计数之间仅在流式细胞术法中观察到良好的相关性。除镜检法外,女性标本的白细胞通常显示出较高的值。肾脏疾病患者的管型在流式细胞术法中显著升高。在所有方法中,蛋白尿标本的沉渣中管型计数较高。从这些结果我们得出结论,流式细胞术法在临床上是有用的,特别是在尿路疾病标本中。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three methods for analysis of urinary sediments.三种尿沉渣分析方法的比较
Osaka City Med J. 1996 Dec;42(2):77-92.
2
Urinary sediment analyzed by flow cytometry.通过流式细胞术分析尿沉渣。
Cytometry. 1995 Mar 15;22(1):75-9. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990220114.
3
Urine analysis performed by flow cytometry: reference range determination and comparison to morphological findings, dipstick chemistry and bacterial culture results--a multicenter study.流式细胞术进行尿液分析:参考范围的确定以及与形态学结果、试条化学分析和细菌培养结果的比较——一项多中心研究
Clin Nephrol. 2001 May;55(5):384-92.
4
Inaccuracy and inefficiency of urinary sediment analysis.尿沉渣分析的不准确与低效。
Osaka City Med J. 1995 Dec;41(2):41-8.
5
Quantitative analysis of urine sediment using newly designed centrifuge tubes.使用新设计的离心管对尿沉渣进行定量分析。
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2002 Winter;32(1):55-60.
6
Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.尿沉渣检查:手工法与iQ200全自动尿沉渣分析仪的比较
Clin Chim Acta. 2005 Aug;358(1-2):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2005.02.021.
7
[Clinical significance of urinary sediment dysmorphic red blood cells and casts in renal disease].[尿沉渣异形红细胞及管型在肾脏疾病中的临床意义]
Rinsho Byori. 1992 Jul;40(7):720-7.
8
Predicting urine culture results by dipstick testing and phase contrast microscopy.通过试纸检测和相差显微镜检查预测尿培养结果。
Pathology. 2003 Apr;35(2):161-5.
9
[Determination of glucose, proteins, blood and leucocytes in urines: evaluation of automated analyzer Aution Max AX 4280].[尿液中葡萄糖、蛋白质、血液和白细胞的测定:自动分析仪Aution Max AX 4280的评估]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2005 Nov-Dec;63(6):619-26.
10
Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy.尿沉渣检查:自动尿液分析系统与手工显微镜检查的比较
Clin Chim Acta. 2007 Sep;384(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 May 26.