Hudon C, Turcotte H, Laviolette M, Carrier G, Boulet L P
Unité de Recherche, Centre de Pneumologie de l'Hôpital Laval, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Feb;78(2):195-202. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63387-x.
Incomplete reversibility of airflow obstruction (IRAO) can be observed in some asthmatic patients without significant smoking history nor evidence of other respiratory condition. The characteristics of this group remain however to be defined.
We compared 18 asthmatic patients with persistent airflow obstruction, defined as an FEV1 < or = 75% predicted despite optimal corticosteroid treatment, to others with complete reversibility of airflow obstruction, paired for age and gender (CRAO, FEV1 > 80% of predicted).
Mean duration of asthma was 31.6 years for IRAO patients and 17.7 for the CRAO group and mean baseline FEV1 was 48.6 +/- 2.6% and 89.3 +/- 3.4%, respectively. Patients with IRAO had more severe airflow obstruction and hyperinflation than those with CRAO, while lung compliance and CO diffusion were similar. Overall healthcare use was similar in the two groups, but those with IRAO had a greater global asthma-related discomfort, increased diurnal variation of airflow obstruction and used higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids than those with CRAO. Patients with IRAO had slightly increased airway wall thickness on high resolution chest tomography compared with CRAO. Baseline FEV1 however, was not correlated with the measured airway wall thickness.
We found that asthmatic patients with IRAO have a more severe asthma and asthma of longer duration than asthmatic subjects with CRAO. Our data suggest that in asthma, IRAO may result from long-standing airway inflammation and associated structural changes, although this remains to be further documented.
在一些无明显吸烟史且无其他呼吸道疾病证据的哮喘患者中,可观察到气流受限不完全可逆(IRAO)。然而,这一群体的特征仍有待明确。
我们将18例持续性气流受限的哮喘患者(定义为尽管接受了最佳皮质类固醇治疗,FEV1仍≤预测值的75%)与其他气流受限完全可逆的患者(按年龄和性别配对,CRAO,FEV1>预测值的80%)进行了比较。
IRAO患者的哮喘平均病程为31.6年,CRAO组为17.7年,平均基线FEV1分别为48.6±2.6%和89.3±3.4%。与CRAO患者相比,IRAO患者的气流受限和肺过度充气更为严重,而肺顺应性和一氧化碳弥散相似。两组的总体医疗保健使用情况相似,但IRAO患者的整体哮喘相关不适更严重,气流受限的日变化增加,吸入皮质类固醇的剂量高于CRAO患者。与CRAO相比,IRAO患者在高分辨率胸部断层扫描上的气道壁厚度略有增加。然而,基线FEV1与测量的气道壁厚度无关。
我们发现,与CRAO的哮喘患者相比,IRAO的哮喘患者哮喘更严重,病程更长。我们的数据表明,在哮喘中,IRAO可能源于长期的气道炎症和相关的结构变化,尽管这仍有待进一步证实。