Suppr超能文献

哮喘治疗的第一步:β2受体激动剂还是吸入性糖皮质激素?

Step one for asthma treatment: Beta2-agonists or inhaled corticosteroids?

作者信息

Redington A E

机构信息

University of Hull, England.

出版信息

Drugs. 2001;61(9):1231-8. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161090-00001.

Abstract

Inhaled corticosteroids have proven effectiveness in chronic persistent asthma and are now recommended as first-line therapy in this condition. In contrast, long term preventative therapy is not currently considered necessary for patients with disease that is only mild and episodic. Recently, there has been growing interest in the possible benefits of using inhaled corticosteroids at an earlier stage in asthma, as soon as the condition is diagnosed. The concept of early intervention is supported by the recognition that airway inflammation is common to all grades of asthma, including early and mild disease. A number of studies have suggested that delayed introduction of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma can result in a poorer clinical response. The precise reason for this is unknown, although it may result from persistent uncontrolled inflammation leading to airway remodelling associated with airflow obstruction that is relatively resistant to therapy. There have also been suggestions that early intervention may alter the natural history of the disease, either to induce sustained remission or to prevent long term decline in lung function, but these effects have yet to be clearly established. On the basis of present knowledge, early intervention remains controversial, particularly in children. The Steroid Treatment As Regular Therapy (START) trial is a large, placebo-controlled, multicentre study that is currently comparing early and delayed use of inhaled corticosteroids in adults and children with newly diagnosed asthma. It is hoped that this study will resolve some of the present uncertainties, and lead to a better understanding of whether an early intervention strategy in asthma can be justified.

摘要

吸入性糖皮质激素已被证明对慢性持续性哮喘有效,目前被推荐为此类病症的一线治疗方法。相比之下,对于仅患有轻度发作性疾病的患者,目前并不认为有必要进行长期预防性治疗。最近,人们越来越关注在哮喘诊断后尽早使用吸入性糖皮质激素可能带来的益处。早期干预的概念得到了以下认识的支持:气道炎症在所有哮喘分级中都很常见,包括早期和轻度疾病。多项研究表明,哮喘患者延迟使用吸入性糖皮质激素可能导致临床反应较差。尽管这可能是由于持续的未控制炎症导致气道重塑,进而引起对治疗相对抵抗的气流阻塞,但确切原因尚不清楚。也有观点认为早期干预可能会改变疾病的自然病程,要么诱导持续缓解,要么防止肺功能长期下降,但这些效果尚未得到明确证实。基于目前的知识,早期干预仍然存在争议,尤其是在儿童中。“类固醇作为常规治疗(START)试验”是一项大型、安慰剂对照、多中心研究,目前正在比较新诊断哮喘的成人和儿童早期和延迟使用吸入性糖皮质激素的情况。希望这项研究能够解决目前的一些不确定性,并更好地理解哮喘的早期干预策略是否合理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验