de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Monjaud I, Delaye J
CERMEP CNRS UMR 1216, Lyon, France.
Eur Heart J. 1997 Jan;18(1):13-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015094.
From this detailed analysis of the main dietary trials conducted over the last 30 years in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease, it can be said that the older trials were conducted on low risk patients and used high fat diets (about 40% of energy as lipids), comprising low saturated fat and cholesterol intake but very high (15 to 20% of energy) polyunsaturated fat intake, particularly from the omega-6 fatty acid family. These experimental diets were designed to reduce blood cholesterol and failed to improve prognosis. By contrast, recent trials were not primarily designed to reduce cholesterol, were conducted in medium- and high-risk patients and used low fat diets supplemented by omega-3 fatty acids from various sources. In two of these trials, the consumption of natural antioxidants, oligoelements and vegetable proteins was increased. Recurrence rate was reduced in the range of 30 to 70%. One conclusion from these well-conducted recent experiments on more than 3000 patients is that new and more specific dietary recommendations are clearly warranted in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. They should be more specific and more clearly defined and therefore different from those generally provided in the U.S.A. and Europe at present. In a recent Consensus Panel statement, authors wrote less than one line to describe a cardioprotective diet in patients with coronary heart disease, summarized as < or = 30% fat, < 7% saturated fat, < 200 mg.day-1 cholesterol. This is both too much (too restrictive to hope that white European and American patients will adhere in the long-term) and insufficient because dietary counselling cannot be restricted to three factors. Ulbricht and Southgate recently emphasized that the relationship between diet and coronary heart disease is more complex than the current cholesterol hypothesis. They identified at least seven major dietary factors, including fibres, although the evidence of an effect on coronary heart disease is weak. However, they did not mention vegetable and fish proteins which are rich in arginine and L-glutamine, major regulators of cardiovascular function. Thus, new dietary advice should include: reduce intake of total (not more than 30% of energy) and saturated (less than 10%) fats maintain intake at least minimally, of the essential omega-6 fatty acids augment consumption of oleic acid and moderately increase consumption of omega-3 fatty acids augment intake of natural antioxidants and oligo-elements maintain sufficient intake of vegetable proteins As conceptualized in the 'Mediterranean' and 'Asian-vegetarian' types of diet, it is very important that a healthy diet should be thought of as a whole rather than as a recitation of good and bad components. Although these protective dietary modifications should probably all be used in each patient to obtain maximal efficacy, these scientifically quantitated principles should be adapted to the culture, ethnic origin and 'image of the world' of each patient in order to create an environment favourable to the perception of positive associations between various foods and healthy habits.
通过对过去30年中进行的冠心病二级预防主要饮食试验的详细分析,可以说,早期试验针对的是低风险患者,采用高脂肪饮食(约40%的能量来自脂质),饱和脂肪和胆固醇摄入量低,但多不饱和脂肪摄入量非常高(占能量的15%至20%),特别是来自ω-6脂肪酸家族。这些实验性饮食旨在降低血液胆固醇,但未能改善预后。相比之下,近期试验并非主要旨在降低胆固醇,而是针对中高风险患者进行的,采用了补充各种来源ω-3脂肪酸的低脂肪饮食。在其中两项试验中,天然抗氧化剂、微量元素和植物蛋白的摄入量有所增加。复发率降低了30%至70%。这些针对3000多名患者进行的近期精心设计的实验得出的一个结论是,在冠心病二级预防中,显然需要新的、更具体的饮食建议。这些建议应该更具体、更明确,因此与目前美国和欧洲普遍提供的建议不同。在最近的一份共识小组声明中,作者只用了不到一行字来描述冠心病患者的心脏保护饮食,总结为脂肪≤30%、饱和脂肪<7%、胆固醇<200毫克/天。这既太多(限制过严,难以期望欧美白人患者长期坚持)又不够,因为饮食咨询不能仅限于这三个因素。乌尔布里希特和索思盖特最近强调,饮食与冠心病之间的关系比目前的胆固醇假说更为复杂。他们确定了至少七个主要饮食因素,包括纤维,尽管其对冠心病影响的证据不足。然而,他们没有提及富含精氨酸和L-谷氨酰胺的植物蛋白和鱼类蛋白,而这两种蛋白是心血管功能的主要调节因子。因此,新的饮食建议应包括:减少总脂肪(不超过能量的30%)和饱和脂肪(少于10%)的摄入量,至少维持必需ω-6脂肪酸的最低摄入量,增加油酸的摄入量并适度增加ω-3脂肪酸的摄入量,增加天然抗氧化剂和微量元素的摄入量,保持足够的植物蛋白摄入量。正如“地中海”和“亚洲素食”类型饮食所概念化的那样,将健康饮食视为一个整体而非列举好坏成分非常重要。尽管为了获得最大疗效,可能应该在每位患者身上综合运用所有这些保护性饮食调整措施,但这些经过科学量化的原则应根据每位患者的文化、种族出身和“世界观”进行调整,以营造一个有利于认识各种食物与健康习惯之间积极关联的环境。