Michel A, Kohlmann T, Raspe H
RheumaKlinik wiesbaden II Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck, Germany.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Feb 1;22(3):296-303; discussion 303-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199702010-00013.
A cross-sectional population-based study of back pain.
To evaluate the association between clinical findings on physical examination and subjective severity in nonspecific back pain.
Assessment of severity of back pain always has been controversial. Most studies evaluating the role of clinical findings in back pain have been hospital- or clinic-based, often representing a highly select population. This selection is avoided in the population-based approach of the present study.
Approximately 4,000 German inhabitants of Lubeck, aged 25-74, were selected randomly from the local population registry and received a postal questionnaire. Those who reported "back pain today" (n = 1200) or "back pain within the past 12 months but no back pain before" (n = 75) were invited to come in for a clinical examination. Thirty-four physical measurements were taken. They were divided into four groups: static measurements, dynamic measurements, neurologic findings, and non-organic physical signs. Self-reported severity of back pain was measured by a pain questionnaire and a 12-item activities of daily living list to assess functional disability.
Within each of the four groups of physical measurements, those that corresponded best with the subjective severity of back pain could be identified (e.g., rotation, lateral flexion, and fingertip-floor distance, scoliosis, the position of the side plumb line, and pain on percussion of the spine pseudo-Lasegue and hand muscle-strength). Those that corresponded best could be differentiated statistically from less correlative measurements such as kyphosis and lordosis; flexion of the lumbar, thoracic, or cervical spine, abdominal muscle strength, and axial loading. The agreement between the classification of back pain severity based on clinical findings and the classification based on self-reports was moderate (kappa = 0.47).
Assessment of severity in back pain can only partly be based on the clinical findings of a physical examination. There is a relatively weak agreement between the results of physical examination and the subjective reporting of pain and disability.
一项基于人群的背痛横断面研究。
评估非特异性背痛体格检查的临床发现与主观严重程度之间的关联。
背痛严重程度的评估一直存在争议。大多数评估临床发现在背痛中作用的研究都是基于医院或诊所的,通常代表的是经过高度筛选的人群。本研究基于人群的方法避免了这种筛选。
从吕贝克当地人口登记处随机选取约4000名年龄在25 - 74岁的德国居民,并向他们发送邮政问卷。那些报告“今天背痛”(n = 1200)或“过去12个月内背痛但之前无背痛”(n = 75)的人被邀请前来进行临床检查。进行了34项体格测量。它们被分为四组:静态测量、动态测量、神经学检查结果和非器质性体征。通过疼痛问卷和一份包含12项日常生活活动的清单来测量自我报告的背痛严重程度,以评估功能障碍。
在四组体格测量中的每一组内,都能确定与背痛主观严重程度最相符的测量指标(例如,旋转、侧屈、指尖到地面距离、脊柱侧弯、侧垂线位置以及脊柱假性直腿抬高试验叩击痛和手部肌肉力量)。那些最相符的测量指标在统计学上可以与相关性较低的测量指标区分开来,如脊柱后凸和前凸;腰椎、胸椎或颈椎的屈曲、腹肌力量和轴向负荷。基于临床发现的背痛严重程度分类与基于自我报告的分类之间的一致性为中等(kappa = 0.47)。
背痛严重程度的评估只能部分基于体格检查的临床发现。体格检查结果与疼痛和功能障碍的主观报告之间的一致性相对较弱。