Schwenzer K S, Pearlman R, Tsilimidos M, Salamone S J, Cannon R C, Wong S H, Gock S B, Jentzen J J
Roche Diagnostic Systems, Somerville, New Jersey 08876, USA.
J Anal Toxicol. 2000 Nov-Dec;24(8):726-32. doi: 10.1093/jat/24.8.726.
The performance of the new fluorescence polarization immunoassay reagents Cassette COBAS INTEGRA Serum Benzodiazepines assay (SBENZ) and Cassette Serum Barbiturates assay (SBARB) was evaluated as compared to other immunoassays (Abbott TDx Serum Benzodiazepines, Abbott TDx Urine Benzodiazepines, Behring EMIT Serum Benzodiazepines, Abbott ADx Serum Barbiturates, Behring EMIT Serum Barbiturates, and the COBAS INTEGRA Barbiturates (BARB) urine assay) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Recoveries of nordiazepam and secobarbital using the SBENZ and SBARB assays, respectively, were equivalent for serum, plasma, and urine. Cross-reactivities of structurally related benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and their metabolites were very similar in serum and urine for the SBENZ and SBARB assays. Precision was within 5.4% for SBENZ serum and within 11% from 10 to 100 ng/mL for urine. Precision was within 5% for SBARB serum and within 7% from 136 to 277 ng/mL for the urine application. The standard curves for SBENZ and SBARB were stable for at least 16 weeks with the reagents stored open on the COBAS INTEGRA analyzer. Clinical comparison of the SBENZ serum assay indicated an increased pickup rate, as confirmed by GC-MS, compared to TDx and EMIT. The diagnostic sensitivities of the SBENZ serum application, TDx, and EMIT versus GC-MS were 100%, 89%, and 36%, respectively. The diagnostic specificities were 71%, 79%, and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivities of the SBENZ urine application and TDx versus GC-MS were 100% and the diagnostic specificities were 88%. The increased positive pick-up of the SBENZ assay compared to the other immunoassays is most probably due to the difference in the limit of detection (LOD) and the increased cross-reactivity for the low-dose benzodiazepines. Clinical comparison of the SBARB serum assay indicated an increased positive pick-up rate, as confirmed by GC-MS. The diagnostic sensitivities of the SBARB serum application, ADx, and EMIT versus GC-MS were 96%, 65%, and 35%, respectively. The diagnostic specificities were all 100%. The diagnostic sensitivities for the SBARB urine application and BARB versus GC-MS were all 100%, and the diagnostic specificities were all 91%. The SBENZ and SBARB kits demonstrated increased sensitivity for the detection of benzodiazepines and barbiturates in both serum and urine compared to the other immunoassays.
将新型荧光偏振免疫分析试剂盒COBAS INTEGRA血清苯二氮䓬检测法(SBENZ)和血清巴比妥检测法(SBARB)的性能与其他免疫分析方法(雅培TDx血清苯二氮䓬检测法、雅培TDx尿液苯二氮䓬检测法、贝林EMIT血清苯二氮䓬检测法、雅培ADx血清巴比妥检测法、贝林EMIT血清巴比妥检测法以及COBAS INTEGRA巴比妥(BARB)尿液检测法)和气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC - MS)进行了评估。分别使用SBENZ和SBARB检测法时,去甲西泮和司可巴比妥在血清、血浆和尿液中的回收率相当。对于SBENZ和SBARB检测法,结构相关的苯二氮䓬、巴比妥及其代谢物在血清和尿液中的交叉反应性非常相似。SBENZ血清检测的精密度在5.4%以内,尿液检测在10至100 ng/mL范围内精密度在11%以内。SBARB血清检测的精密度在5%以内,尿液检测在136至277 ng/mL范围内精密度在7%以内。在COBAS INTEGRA分析仪上打开存放试剂时,SBENZ和SBARB的标准曲线至少16周保持稳定。SBENZ血清检测的临床比较表明,与TDx和EMIT相比,经GC - MS确认其阳性检出率有所提高。SBENZ血清检测法、TDx和EMIT相对于GC - MS的诊断敏感性分别为100%、89%和36%。诊断特异性分别为71%、79%和100%。SBENZ尿液检测法和TDx相对于GC - MS的诊断敏感性均为100%,诊断特异性为88%。与其他免疫分析方法相比,SBENZ检测法阳性检出率增加很可能是由于检测限(LOD)的差异以及低剂量苯二氮䓬交叉反应性增加所致。SBARB血清检测的临床比较表明,经GC - MS确认其阳性检出率有所提高。SBARB血清检测法、ADx和EMIT相对于GC - MS的诊断敏感性分别为96%、65%和35%。诊断特异性均为100%。SBARB尿液检测法和BARB相对于GC - MS的诊断敏感性均为100%,诊断特异性均为91%。与其他免疫分析方法相比,SBENZ和SBARB试剂盒在血清和尿液中检测苯二氮䓬和巴比妥时均表现出更高的敏感性。