Patterson R B, Pinto B, Marcus B, Colucci A, Braun T, Roberts M
Department of Surgery, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 1997 Feb;25(2):312-8; discussion 318-9. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70352-5.
This study was performed to test the effectiveness of a formal supervised exercise program against a home-based exercise program for both walking ability and quality of life endpoints.
Patients with arterial claudication were randomized to either a 12-week supervised exercise program (SUPEX) with weekly lectures relating to peripheral vascular disease or to a home exercise group (HOMEX) who attended an identical lecture program and received weekly exercise instruction. The study population included 29 men and 26 women, with a mean age of 69.1 +/- 8.1 years. Forty-seven patients completed the 12-week program, 46 were available for testing at completion, and 38 for 6-month testing. Claudication pain time (CPT) and maximum walking time (MWT) on a progressive treadmill exercise test were assessed at baseline, program completion, and 6 months. The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) was administered at these intervals to assess effects on quality of life.
Each group improved (p < 0.001) in both CPT and MWT at the completion of the 12-week program, which was sustained at the 6-month follow-up. Increase in HOMEX CPT from baseline (3.6 +/- 2.73 minutes) to 6-month follow-up (6.6 +/- 3.17 minutes) was less than for the SUPEX group (3.8 +/- 2.74 to 11.2 +/- 4.02 minutes, respectively); similar results were obtained for MWT. At both completion and 6 months, there was a significant intergroup difference for CPT and MWT (p < 0.004) favoring SUPEX. For both groups, measures of health perception based on the SF-36 demonstrated improvement (p < 0.002) in Physical Function Subscale, Bodily Pain Subscale, and Physical Composite Score. There were no between-group differences on the subsets of the SF-36 at the three assessment intervals.
Supervised exercise programs provide superior increased walking ability in the noninterventional therapy of arterial claudication, and both supervised and home based exercise therapy result in improved SF-36 functional measures. The lack of intergroup differences in these measures may be a result of the high degree of interaction with healthcare providers in the HOMEX group. Although a supervised program results in optimal walking benefits, a highly structured home-based program provides similar functional improvement and may be a satisfactory alternative for patients with lesser walking requirements.
本研究旨在测试正规的监督运动计划与家庭运动计划对步行能力和生活质量终点指标的有效性。
间歇性跛行患者被随机分为两组,一组接受为期12周的监督运动计划(SUPEX),每周参加有关外周血管疾病的讲座;另一组为家庭运动组(HOMEX),参加相同的讲座计划并接受每周的运动指导。研究人群包括29名男性和26名女性,平均年龄为69.1±8.1岁。47名患者完成了12周的计划,46名患者在计划完成时可进行测试,38名患者在6个月时进行测试。在基线、计划完成时和6个月时,通过渐进式跑步机运动测试评估间歇性跛行疼痛时间(CPT)和最大步行时间(MWT)。在这些时间间隔使用医学结局研究简表36(SF-36)来评估对生活质量的影响。
在12周计划完成时,两组的CPT和MWT均有改善(p<0.001),且在6个月随访时持续存在。HOMEX组CPT从基线(3.6±2.73分钟)到6个月随访时(6.6±3.17分钟)的增加幅度小于SUPEX组(分别从3.8±2.74分钟到11.2±4.02分钟);MWT也得到类似结果。在计划完成时和6个月时,CPT和MWT的组间差异均有统计学意义(p<0.004),SUPEX组更优。对于两组,基于SF-36的健康感知指标在身体功能分量表、身体疼痛分量表和身体综合评分方面均显示出改善(p<0.002)。在三个评估时间点,SF-36各子集的组间差异均无统计学意义。
在间歇性跛行的非介入治疗中,监督运动计划能更有效地提高步行能力,监督运动疗法和家庭运动疗法均可改善SF-36功能指标。这些指标缺乏组间差异可能是由于HOMEX组与医疗保健提供者的高度互动。虽然监督计划能带来最佳的步行益处,但高度结构化的家庭运动计划也能提供类似的功能改善,对于步行需求较低的患者可能是一个令人满意的选择。