关于人和生物体：对霍塞皮安的回应。
Of persons and organisms: a reply to Howsepian.
作者信息
Lockwood M
机构信息
University of Oxford.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 1997 Feb;23(1):42-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.1.42.
Abstract
Howsepian has presented a number of thought experiments, which are designed to undermine my claim that our identity through time is grounded in the continued existence of those structures in our brains which directly underlie mental functioning. I argue that the conclusions which Howsepian draws from these thought experiments are mistaken, and that his discussion of them is vitiated, in particular, by his failure to distinguish between personal identity and the identity of the associated human organism.
摘要
霍塞皮安提出了一些思想实验，其目的是削弱我的主张，即我们随时间推移的身份认同基于我们大脑中那些直接支撑心理功能的结构的持续存在。我认为霍塞皮安从这些思想实验中得出的结论是错误的，而且他对这些实验的讨论存在缺陷，尤其是他未能区分个人身份与相关人类有机体的身份。
相似文献
1
Of persons and organisms: a reply to Howsepian.关于人和生物体：对霍塞皮安的回应。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Feb;23(1):42-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.1.42.
2
Lockwood on human identity and the primitive streak.洛克伍德论人类身份与原条。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Feb;23(1):38-41. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.1.38.
3
The potentiality argument in the debate relating to the beginning of personhood.关于人格起始问题辩论中的潜在性论证。
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2000;6(2):19-26. doi: 10.1179/hrge.6.2.y4v1p37874v42181.
4
The personhood of the human embryo.人类胚胎的人格地位。
J Med Philos. 1993 Aug;18(4):399-417. doi: 10.1093/jmp/18.4.399.
5
Human identity and the primitive streak.人类身份与原条
Hastings Cent Rep. 1995 Jan-Feb;25(1):45.
6
Metaphysics and medical ethics: a reply.形而上学与医学伦理学：一则回应
J Med Ethics. 1994 Mar;20(1):50-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.1.50.
7
The future-like-ours argument, personal identity, and the twinning dilemma.
Soc Theory Pract. 2003 Jul;29(3):419-30. doi: 10.5840/soctheorpract200329319.
8
Persons, practices, and the conception argument.
J Med Philos. 1997 Oct;22(5):479-94. doi: 10.1093/jmp/22.5.479.
9
The Pope and the ontogeny of persons.
Nature. 1995 Jan 12;373(6510):100. doi: 10.1038/373100a0.
10
Who or what are we?我们是谁？或者我们是什么？
Rev Metaphys. 1992 Mar;45(3):483-502.
引用本文的文献
1
The Constitution of the Human Embryo as Substantial Change.作为实质性变化的人类胚胎构成
J Med Philos. 2016 Apr;41(2):172-91. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv062. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
Zotero 插件