Suppr超能文献

新生儿包皮环切术对后续常规疫苗接种时疼痛反应的影响。

Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination.

作者信息

Taddio A, Katz J, Ilersich A L, Koren G

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet. 1997 Mar 1;349(9052):599-603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10316-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preliminary studies suggested that pain experienced by infants in the neonatal period may have long-lasting effects on future infant behaviour. The objectives of this study were to find out whether neonatal circumcision altered pain response at 4-month or 6-month vaccination compared with the response in uncircumcised infants, and whether pretreatment of circumcision pain with lidocaine-prilocaine cream (Emla) affects the subsequent vaccination response.

METHODS

We used a prospective cohort design to study 87 infants. The infants formed three groups--uncircumcised infants, and infants who had been randomly assigned Emla or placebo in a previous clinical trial to assess the efficacy of Emla cream as pretreatment for pain in neonatal circumcision. Infants were videotaped during vaccination done at the primary care physician's clinic. Videotapes were scored without knowledge of circumcision or treatment status by a research assistant who had been trained to measure infant facial action, cry duration, and visual analogue scale pain scores.

FINDINGS

Birth characteristics and infant characteristics at the time of vaccination, including age and temperament scores, did not differ significantly among groups. Multivariate ANOVA revealed a significant group effect (p < 0.001) in difference (vaccination minus baseline) values for percentage facial action, percentage cry time, and visual analogue scale pain scores. Univariate ANOVAs were significant for all outcome measures (p < 0.05): infants circumcised with placebo had higher difference scores than uncircumcised infants for percentage facial action (136.9 vs 77.5%), percentage cry duration (53.8 vs 24.7%), and visual analogue scale pain scores (5.1 vs 3.1 cm). There was a significant linear trend on all outcome measures, showing increasing pain scores from uncircumcised infants, to those circumcised with Emla, to those circumcised with placebo.

INTERPRETATION

Circumcised infants showed a stronger pain response to subsequent routine vaccination than uncircumcised infants. Among the circumcised group, preoperative treatment with Emla attenuated the pain response to vaccination. We recommend treatment to prevent neonatal circumcision pain.

摘要

背景

初步研究表明,新生儿期婴儿所经历的疼痛可能会对其未来行为产生长期影响。本研究的目的是确定与未行包皮环切术的婴儿相比,新生儿包皮环切术是否会改变4个月或6个月接种疫苗时的疼痛反应,以及用利多卡因-丙胺卡因乳膏(复方利多卡因乳膏)预处理包皮环切术疼痛是否会影响随后的疫苗接种反应。

方法

我们采用前瞻性队列设计研究了87名婴儿。这些婴儿分为三组——未行包皮环切术的婴儿,以及在先前一项临床试验中被随机分配使用复方利多卡因乳膏或安慰剂以评估复方利多卡因乳膏作为新生儿包皮环切术疼痛预处理疗效的婴儿。在初级保健医生诊所进行疫苗接种时对婴儿进行录像。一名经过培训以测量婴儿面部动作、哭闹持续时间和视觉模拟评分疼痛分数的研究助理在不知道包皮环切术或治疗状况的情况下对录像进行评分。

结果

接种疫苗时的出生特征和婴儿特征,包括年龄和气质评分,在各组之间没有显著差异。多变量方差分析显示,在面部动作百分比、哭闹时间百分比和视觉模拟评分疼痛分数的差值(接种疫苗减去基线)值方面存在显著的组效应(p < 0.001)。单变量方差分析对所有结局指标均有显著意义(p < 0.05):接受安慰剂包皮环切术的婴儿在面部动作百分比(136.9% 对77.5%)、哭闹持续时间百分比(53.8% 对24.7%)和视觉模拟评分疼痛分数(5.1 cm对3.1 cm)方面的差值得分高于未行包皮环切术的婴儿。在所有结局指标上均存在显著的线性趋势,表明疼痛分数从未行包皮环切术的婴儿,到接受复方利多卡因乳膏包皮环切术的婴儿,再到接受安慰剂包皮环切术的婴儿逐渐增加。

解读

与未行包皮环切术的婴儿相比,行包皮环切术的婴儿对随后的常规疫苗接种表现出更强的疼痛反应。在接受包皮环切术的组中,术前使用复方利多卡因乳膏减轻了对疫苗接种的疼痛反应。我们建议进行治疗以预防新生儿包皮环切术疼痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验